Re: Numlock as standard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 11:30 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:

[snip]

I really do NOT see the point in the NUMLOCK function when the keyboard
has those same (page up, page down, etc.) keys right next to the number
pad.  :-\


How unimaginative. How about: playing a game where one uses the
keypad to move the character, and one still wants numeric keys
to be repeat counts for things like rest?

I hate for my keypad to have numlock on. I use the keypad for
maneuvering around while editing.

So, one man's meat is another man's poison.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux