On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 06:56, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote: > Unfortunately SpamAssassin's default scores are absolutely meaningless > in this regard. The people behind it are good coders but have shown > little understanding of statistics and abuse the scoring system as a > catch all facility. > > What I am trying to say is, that for example about 90% of the messages > from a dynamic IP are spam which in turn means that each message > matching this criteria has a probability of about 90% of being spam. That might be true for you, but would be highly variable for others. If you typically correspond with people who run servers in their homes you would see a lot more non-spam email coming from dynamic IPs. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx