Re: blacklisting by SORBS

• To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: blacklisting by SORBS
• From: "Thomas Cameron" <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:01:28 -0500 (CDT)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-9.EL4

I use SpamAssassin and milter-greylist.  SA uses blocklists, but it only
assigns a positive score if a blocklist pops, it doesn't reject out of
hand.

I do *not* reject based on single blocklist entries.

Thomas

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: blacklisting by SORBS
    • From: Les Mikesell

• References:
  • blacklisting by SORBS
    • From: Claude Jones
  • Re: blacklisting by SORBS
    • From: Thomas Cameron
  • Re: blacklisting by SORBS
    • From: Scot L. Harris

• Prev by Date: Re: pb with sudo
• Next by Date: Re: pb with sudo
• Previous by thread: Re: blacklisting by SORBS
• Next by thread: Re: blacklisting by SORBS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread