WP rocks; easier to set up than Mambo and the php-whatever ones. Also I setup mambo at my hosing company and they said it would require an upgrade since it requires a dedicated server, only runs with certain apache versions, etc. WP is very very light on the other hand, great for blogging and CMS.
My site is forensiclug.com
Marc
On 8/10/05, Ezra Nugroho <enugroho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is a great review tools in http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
I think if you are php person, go for Mambo. If you are a perl person go
with webgui.
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 20:32 +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> Thierry Sayegh wrote:
> > Thiago Amaury Ferraz wrote:
>
> >>Someone knows some good content manager like/else PHP-Nuke? Could say
> >>the URL!? I know Typo3, but it is much complex, and the Nuke.. now, it
> >>is not so free..
> >
> > Have a look at http://www.opensourcecms.com/
> > I think it's what you are after in the end
> > hth
> > Thierry
> >
>
> Can someone suggest a good Content Management System which is
> appropriate for a directory of web sites and URLs ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Manish
>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
