--- fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Agpgart failing? (Dave Jones) > 2. Configuring printer on FC4 (Pushparaj Shetty) > 3. Re: Configuring printer on FC4 (alwaleedX) > 4. OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Gaddis, > Jeremy L.) > 5. Re: Agpgart failing? (Roger Grosswiler) > 6. which rpm provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) > (Ankush Grover) > 7. BUG: system time is wrong in FC4 (Florin > Andrei) > 8. Re: codec 'dfs' (Ping-Wu Zhang) > 9. Re: making Samba work [new detail] (Paul > Howarth) > 10. Re: Running a script at boot [solved] (Dotan > Cohen) > 11. How to select nic while bootup? (Roger > Grosswiler) > 12. VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution (Roger > Grosswiler) > 13. Re: which rpm provides > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) (Paul Howarth) > 14. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Mogens > Kjaer) > 15. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Paul > Howarth) > 16. Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not > linked to /dev/hda > (Paul Howarth) > 17. openwbem (Andreas Wahlert) > 18. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? > (Gaddis, Jeremy L.) > 19. Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data... > (Paul Howarth) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:32:51 -0400 > From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Agpgart failing? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20050808053251.GD5844@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger > Grosswiler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this message: > > > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0 failed > with error -22...: 1 > > Time(s) > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1 > failed with error -22...: > > 1 Time(s) > > > > can anybody help what this is and how to resolve? > > Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is really > hard > to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot of > debugging > over the last few years (basically since it was > first written). > > Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not, > that's > probably why its complaining. Either way, given its > a server, > it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on x86 > is only > useful for 3D graphics. > > Dave > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:07:52 +0530 > From: Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Configuring printer on FC4 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > <69a159a505080722378b8755b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on > FC4? > > Pushparaj > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:41:50 +0300 > From: alwaleedX <alwaleed.x@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Configuring printer on FC4 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <43807d8805080722419ba9ad2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > use system-config-printer command > > On 8/8/05, Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on > FC4? > > > > Pushparaj > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > -- > ************************* > -}» Regards > -}» Grasp All Lose All > ************************* > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050808/d73ecdc3/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:50:51 -0500 > From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? > To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42F6F2BB.1070907@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Greetings, > > Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server that > I just purchased is > on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail > servers: > > Aug 7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]: > A52F0516BF9: > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31], > delay=10, status=bounced (host > mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550 > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > Aug 7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]: > 4CE4E516BF9: > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32], > delay=6, status=bounced (host > mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > Aug 7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]: > 657DE516BF9: > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32], > delay=0, status=bounced (host > mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > > I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to > use my mail server > here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP servers > as a smarthost. > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but > can't seem to find any > that my IP address is listed in. I'll have to > reconfigure Thunderbird > when I get to work in the morning, however, and > again when I get home, > etc. (laptop that goes with me). > > Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is > using? Alternatively, > if there's someone from Red Hat who has the ability > to get the > restrictions removed, feel free to contact me > off-list. > > Thanks, > -j > > -- > Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem." > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:09:57 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Agpgart failing? > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <32277.62.2.21.164.1123481397.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger > Grosswiler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this > message: > > > > > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0 > failed with error -22...: 1 > > > Time(s) > > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1 > failed with error > > -22...: > > > 1 Time(s) > > > > > > can anybody help what this is and how to > resolve? > > > > Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is > really hard > > to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot > of debugging > > over the last few years (basically since it was > first written). > > > > Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not, > that's > > probably why its complaining. Either way, given > its a server, > > it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on > x86 is only > > useful for 3D graphics. > > Hey Dave, > > Thanks for replying. No, i don't think there is, > even there is no > necessity on this server...gonna ignore this. Thanks > a lot > Roger > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:46:34 +0530 > From: Ankush Grover <ankush174@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: which rpm provides > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <987ccbd305080723166dd016ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > hey friends, > > Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to > configure CVSWeb on > FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried to > install it .It gave > me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I > downloaded the > perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install > perl-IPC-Run it says > > "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by > perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch". > > I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this > dependency problem.I > also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did not > installed it. > > Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm > will provide the > missing dependencies. > > Thanks & Regards > > Ankush Grover > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:16:23 -0700 > From: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: BUG: system time is wrong in FC4 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123481783.3286.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Please have a look at this bug report... > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164711 > > ...then look at your system and see if it has the > same problem. > Essentially, unless ntpdate succeeds, the system > time gets set wrong. > Even then, if ntpdate runs fine, some applications > (Postfix maybe) still > remain on a different time setting. > > E.g. look at the system logs immediately after a > reboot - you will see a > big jump in the timestamps after ntp kicks in. > > If your system has the same problem, please add your > observations to the > bug report. > > -- > Florin Andrei > > http://florin.myip.org/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:16:38 -1000 > From: Ping-Wu Zhang <pwzhangz@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: codec 'dfs' > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <57739e86050807231667a75532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 > > On 8/7/05, Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi > > > > If I recall correctly, you will need a decoder for > dts. I for instance have a > > dolby suround decoder, which is connected to my > soundcard's digital out. The > > connection is made with a 30? coaxial cable. And, > in order for this to work, > > you must choose the option "pass thru" in xine's > (or mplayer, or ....) audio > > config. Even then, you'll beter of if you choose > the THX sound instead of the > > dts version (dvd language menu). > > > > So, unless you have all that equipment, I suggest > you configure your player to > > output stereo sound, and to select the normal > version of the film. > > > > HTH > > > > Andy > > Thanks. I took your advice, clicked on DVD -> audio > languages and > changed the selection from Dolby Theatre System to > Dolby Digital. Now > I have sound. Great!!! Thanks a whole bunch. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:34:00 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: making Samba work [new detail] > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123482840.2784.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:24 -0400, Claude Jones > wrote: > > On Sat August 6 2005 1:49 pm, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 08:53 -0400, Claude Jones > wrote: > > > > While looking at DNS matters this am, I > checked to see if BIND was > > > > running: > > > > > > > > cj]# service named status > > > > rndc: decode base64 secret: bad base64 > encoding > > > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what this means? > > > > > > Your /etc/rndc.key probably hasn't got a proper > secret in it. > > > > > > > If Jeremy is correct, and I'm running bind-chroot > (didn't I read along the > > way, that this is the FC4 default install?), then, > here's what I've got: > > In /var/named/chroot/etc there are rdnc.key and > named.conf - > > rdnc.key looks like this: > > > > key "rndckey" { > > algorithm hmac-md5; > > secret > "cQQ08BlDIxazAR3ojoKFZWaH8f_long_string....................."; > > }; > > > > > > named.conf - the relevant section - looks like > this: > > > > include "/etc/rndc.key"; > > key "rndckey" { > > algorithm hmac-md5; > > secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA=="; > > }; > > There's your problem. The 'include "/etc/rndc.key"' > is there so that > your named.conf and rndc.conf can share a secret > (both include the same > file). However, your named.conf then introduces a > new version of the > same key, with what appears to be too short a > secret. Try removing the > lines: > > key "rndckey" { > algorithm hmac-md5; > secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA=="; > }; > > > The only rdnc.conf file I can find is in /etc > > It looks like this: > > > > options { > > default-server localhost; > > default-key "rndckey"; > > }; > > > > server localhost { > > key "rndckey"; > > }; > > > > include "/etc/rndc.key"; > > > > This is pointing to the wrong file, no? Shouldn't > it be pointing to the > > rndc.key file in /var/named/chroot/etc ???? > > /etc/rndc.key should be a symlink to the one in the > chroot: > > # ls -l /etc/rndc.key > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Jul 20 04:46 > /etc/rndc.key > -> /var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:54:00 +0300 > From: Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Running a script at boot [solved] > To: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core > releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <880dece00508072354410aa9c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 8/8/05, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx > <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A much simpler way to run a script at boot is to > put it in the > > rc.local file. > > Thanks, Aaron, and to all the others who suggested > this and other > solutions. After googleing every suggestion that was > proposed, this > seemed to be the most 'correct'. It works perfect. > > For the archives: the full path to the rc.local file > is: > /etc/rc.d/rc.local > > Dotan Cohen > http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/334/mckennitt_loreena.php > McKennitt, Loreena Song Lyrics > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:02:10 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: How to select nic while bootup? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > <15236.62.2.21.164.1123484530.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hey list, > > i have 2 laptops, with those i can either connect > via rj-45 or via > wireless. I use (at this stage) WPA to authenticate > on wirless. > > The thing is, that fc tries just to init eth0 on > bootup, not wlan0. So, > all the following networking functionalities will > fail. > > How can i: > > - tell the bootprocess to check also for the > existance of wlan0 ? > - start wpa_supplicant only if wlan0 needs to be > booted? > > should i try to handle this issue on the bootscript > for eth0 itself? > > Thanks for any help > Roger > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:07:23 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > <21886.62.2.21.164.1123484843.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi, > > I have several subnets, one is with wireless > (192.168.0.0/24). > > I would like to connect to my internal subnet > (10.0.0.0/8) using ipsec via > my firewall, which directs the traffic to internet > via the default > gateway. I would also like to use fileservers and > printers from internal > lan as i would be in there. > > Is there some help/doc about this issue? I've been > searching, but did not > find something self-explanatory ;-) > > How to handle the ipsec-connection with > system-config-network? how about > the firewall-computer accepting the connection from > my client via ipsec? > > Thank you very much for your help. I know, there is > OpenVPN, but i would > like to get this running with on-board-ressources > first... > > Roger > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:14:55 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: which rpm provides > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123485295.2784.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:46 +0530, Ankush Grover > wrote: > > hey friends, > > > > Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to > configure CVSWeb on > > FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried to > install it .It gave > > me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I > downloaded the > > perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install > perl-IPC-Run it says > > > > "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by > perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch". > > > > I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this > dependency problem.I > > also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did > not installed it. > > > > Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm > will provide the > > missing dependencies. > > Your perl package should provide this dependency. > > $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)' > perl-5.8.6-15 > > What version of perl do you have on your system? > > $ rpm -q perl > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:17:44 +0200 > From: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42F70718.2070701@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; > format=flowed > > Gaddis, Jeremy L. wrote: > ... > > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but > can't seem to find any > > that my IP address is listed in. > > Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database > lookup" field > on: http://dnsstuff.com/ > > Note: Read the comments at the bottom of the page > after > the search. > > Mogens > -- > Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department > Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark > Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08 > Email: mk@xxxxxx Homepage: http://www.crc.dk > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:22:22 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123485743.2784.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 00:50 -0500, Gaddis, Jeremy L. > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server > that I just purchased is > > on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail > servers: > > > > Aug 7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]: > A52F0516BF9: > > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31], > > delay=10, status=bounced (host > mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550 > > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > > Aug 7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]: > 4CE4E516BF9: > > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32], > > delay=6, status=bounced (host > mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 > > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > > Aug 7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]: > 657DE516BF9: > > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32], > > delay=0, status=bounced (host > mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550 > > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM > command)) > > > > I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to > use my mail server > > here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP > servers as a smarthost. > > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but > can't seem to find any > > that my IP address is listed in. I'll have to > reconfigure Thunderbird > > when I get to work in the morning, however, and > again when I get home, > > etc. (laptop that goes with me). > > Diagnosing such problems is usually easier if you > say what the actual IP > address in question is. > > Given that no reference to an external list is > mentioned in the > rejection message, it's quite possible that it's a > local list run by > redhat themselves for their own use. > > > Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is > using? Alternatively, > > if there's someone from Red Hat who has the > ability to get the > > restrictions removed, feel free to contact me > off-list. > > You might try postmaster at redhat dot com > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:35:17 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not > linked to /dev/hda > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123486518.2784.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 06:32 +0200, Andy Pieters > wrote: > > Hi all > > > > This problem started a while ago but I can't > recall after what. > > > > Now, whenever someone logs in at the console, the > links to /dev/dvd > > and /dev/cdrom aren't made, and I have to do that > manually. > > > > Is there any service in particular that is suposed > to make those symlinks or > > should the gdm or related take care of that? > > The default udev rules for CD/DVD devices usually > pick this up, but you > could try creating a file > /etc/udev/rules.d/10-custom.rules containing: > > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hdX", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="dvd > cdrom" > > Replace "hdX" with the device name that you point > your symlinks at, > which from your Subject: would appear to be "hda". > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:40:42 +0200 > From: Andreas Wahlert <andreas.wahlert@xxxxxx> > Subject: openwbem > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42F70C7A.5050404@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > Hi List, > > > i'm searching for an openwbem package for FC3 or > FC4. But i found on > sourceforge only packages for SuSE Sles (Novell) and > RH1. > > > There are any experiences with WBEM under FC out > there?? > > > > > best regards > > > > andreas > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:43:24 -0500 > From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42F70D1C.5090807@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Mogens Kjaer wrote: > >> I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but > can't seem to find any > >> that my IP address is listed in. > > > Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database > lookup" field > > on: http://dnsstuff.com/ > > Thanks, I hadn't seen that one before. The IP > address in question, > 64.251.22.89 does show up in the SPEWS database. > Reading their page > makes me think that trying to get it removed from > there would be more > trouble than I feel like dealing with right now. > > Thanks, > -j > > -- > Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem." > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:45:00 +0100 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data... > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <1123487101.2784.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 07:26 +1000, Mark Knights > wrote: > > Here is the yum -y data as requested... > > > > Setting up Update Process > > Setting up repositories > > updates-released 100% > |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > > extras 100% > |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 > > base 100% > |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 > > Reading repository metadata in from local files > > primary.xml.gz 100% > |=========================| 136 kB 00:34 > > > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/repodata/primary.xml.gz: > > > [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out > > Trying other mirror. > > Error: failure: repodata/primary.xml.gz from > extras: [Errno 256] No more > > mirrors to try. > > Increasing the timeout as suggested by Thomas would > be a good idea. You > might also want to try using a more local mirror of > the Fedora Extras > repository (the default configuration only uses the > download.fedora.redhat.com site at the moment, which > is often very > busy). > > Try editing /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-extras.repo and > change it from this: > > [extras] > name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch > #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/ > mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever > enabled=1 > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras > gpgcheck=1 > > to this: > > [extras] > name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch > #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/ > #mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever > baseurl=http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/ > > http://mirror.optus.net/fedora/extras/$releasever/$basearch/ > enabled=1 > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras > gpgcheck=1 > > Paul. > -- > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 18, Issue 74 > ******************************************* > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
