help

--- fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 	http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Agpgart failing? (Dave Jones)
>    2. Configuring printer on FC4 (Pushparaj Shetty)
>    3. Re: Configuring printer on FC4 (alwaleedX)
>    4. OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Gaddis,
> Jeremy L.)
>    5. Re: Agpgart failing? (Roger Grosswiler)
>    6. which rpm provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> (Ankush Grover)
>    7. BUG: system time is wrong in FC4 (Florin
> Andrei)
>    8. Re: codec 'dfs' (Ping-Wu Zhang)
>    9. Re: making Samba work [new detail] (Paul
> Howarth)
>   10. Re: Running a script at boot [solved] (Dotan
> Cohen)
>   11. How to select nic while bootup? (Roger
> Grosswiler)
>   12. VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution (Roger
> Grosswiler)
>   13. Re: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) (Paul Howarth)
>   14. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Mogens
> Kjaer)
>   15. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Paul
> Howarth)
>   16. Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not
> linked to /dev/hda
>       (Paul Howarth)
>   17. openwbem (Andreas Wahlert)
>   18. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> (Gaddis, Jeremy L.)
>   19. Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data...
> (Paul Howarth)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:32:51 -0400
> From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Agpgart failing?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20050808053251.GD5844@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger
> Grosswiler wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this message:
>  > 
>  > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0 failed
> with error -22...:  1
>  > Time(s)
>  >     agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1
> failed with error -22...: 
>  > 1 Time(s)
>  > 
>  > can anybody help what this is and how to resolve?
> 
> Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is really
> hard
> to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot of
> debugging
> over the last few years (basically since it was
> first written).
> 
> Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not,
> that's
> probably why its complaining.  Either way, given its
> a server,
> it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on x86
> is only
> useful for 3D graphics.
> 
> 		Dave
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:07:52 +0530
> From: Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Configuring printer on FC4
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <69a159a505080722378b8755b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi,
> How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on
> FC4?
> 
> Pushparaj
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:41:50 +0300
> From: alwaleedX <alwaleed.x@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Configuring printer on FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <43807d8805080722419ba9ad2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> use system-config-printer command 
> 
> On 8/8/05, Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on
> FC4?
> > 
> > Pushparaj
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *************************
> -}» Regards
> -}» Grasp All Lose All
> *************************
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050808/d73ecdc3/attachment.htm
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:50:51 -0500
> From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: fedora-list <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42F6F2BB.1070907@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server that
> I just purchased is
> on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail
> servers:
> 
> Aug  7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]:
> A52F0516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31],
> delay=10, status=bounced (host
> mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> Aug  7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]:
> 4CE4E516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> delay=6, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> Aug  7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]:
> 657DE516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> delay=0, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> 
> I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to
> use my mail server
> here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP servers
> as a smarthost.
> I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> that my IP address is listed in.  I'll have to
> reconfigure Thunderbird
> when I get to work in the morning, however, and
> again when I get home,
> etc. (laptop that goes with me).
> 
> Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is
> using?  Alternatively,
> if there's someone from Red Hat who has the ability
> to get the
> restrictions removed, feel free to contact me
> off-list.
> 
> Thanks,
> -j
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy L. Gaddis     <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem."
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:09:57 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Agpgart failing?
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases"
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <32277.62.2.21.164.1123481397.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger
> Grosswiler wrote:
> >  > Hi,
> >  >
> >  > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this
> message:
> >  >
> >  > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0
> failed with error -22...:  1
> >  > Time(s)
> >  >     agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1
> failed with error
> > -22...:
> >  > 1 Time(s)
> >  >
> >  > can anybody help what this is and how to
> resolve?
> >
> > Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is
> really hard
> > to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot
> of debugging
> > over the last few years (basically since it was
> first written).
> >
> > Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not,
> that's
> > probably why its complaining.  Either way, given
> its a server,
> > it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on
> x86 is only
> > useful for 3D graphics.
> 
> Hey Dave,
> 
> Thanks for replying. No, i don't think there is,
> even there is no
> necessity on this server...gonna ignore this. Thanks
> a lot
> Roger
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:46:34 +0530
> From: Ankush Grover <ankush174@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <987ccbd305080723166dd016ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> hey friends,
> 
>  Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to
> configure CVSWeb on
> FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried  to
> install it .It gave
> me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I
> downloaded the
> perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install
> perl-IPC-Run it says
> 
> "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by
> perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch".
> 
> I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this
> dependency problem.I
> also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did not
> installed it.
> 
> Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm
> will provide the
> missing dependencies.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> 
> Ankush Grover
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:16:23 -0700
> From: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: BUG: system time is wrong in FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123481783.3286.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Please have a look at this bug report...
> 
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164711
> 
> ...then look at your system and see if it has the
> same problem.
> Essentially, unless ntpdate succeeds, the system
> time gets set wrong.
> Even then, if ntpdate runs fine, some applications
> (Postfix maybe) still
> remain on a different time setting.
> 
> E.g. look at the system logs immediately after a
> reboot - you will see a
> big jump in the timestamps after ntp kicks in.
> 
> If your system has the same problem, please add your
> observations to the
> bug report.
> 
> -- 
> Florin Andrei
> 
> http://florin.myip.org/
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:16:38 -1000
> From: Ping-Wu Zhang <pwzhangz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: codec 'dfs'
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <57739e86050807231667a75532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
> 
> On 8/7/05, Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > If I recall correctly, you will need a decoder for
> dts.  I for instance have a
> > dolby suround decoder, which is connected to my
> soundcard's digital out.  The
> > connection is made with a 30? coaxial cable.  And,
> in order for this to work,
> > you must choose the option "pass thru" in xine's
> (or mplayer, or ....) audio
> > config. Even then, you'll beter of if you choose
> the THX sound instead of the
> > dts version (dvd language menu).
> > 
> > So, unless you have all that equipment, I suggest
> you configure your player to
> > output stereo sound, and to select the normal
> version of the film.
> > 
> > HTH
> > 
> > Andy
> 
> Thanks.  I took your advice, clicked on DVD -> audio
> languages and
> changed the selection from Dolby Theatre System to
> Dolby Digital.  Now
> I have sound.  Great!!!  Thanks a whole bunch.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:34:00 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: making Samba work [new detail]
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123482840.2784.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:24 -0400, Claude Jones
> wrote:
> > On Sat August 6 2005 1:49 pm, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 08:53 -0400, Claude Jones
> wrote:
> > > > While looking at DNS matters this am, I
> checked to see if BIND was
> > > > running:
> > > >
> > > > cj]# service named status
> > > > rndc: decode base64 secret: bad base64
> encoding
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone tell me what this means?
> > >
> > > Your /etc/rndc.key probably hasn't got a proper
> secret in it.
> > >
> > 
> > If Jeremy is correct, and I'm running bind-chroot
> (didn't I read along the 
> > way, that this is the FC4 default install?), then,
> here's what I've got:
> > In /var/named/chroot/etc there are rdnc.key and
> named.conf -
> > rdnc.key looks like this:
> > 
> > key "rndckey" {
> >         algorithm       hmac-md5;
> >         secret
>
"cQQ08BlDIxazAR3ojoKFZWaH8f_long_string.....................";
> > };
> > 
> > 
> > named.conf - the relevant section - looks like
> this:
> > 
> > include "/etc/rndc.key";
> > key "rndckey" {
> >       algorithm hmac-md5;
> >       secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA==";
> > };
> 
> There's your problem. The 'include "/etc/rndc.key"'
> is there so that
> your named.conf and rndc.conf can share a secret
> (both include the same
> file). However, your named.conf then introduces a
> new version of the
> same key, with what appears to be too short a
> secret. Try removing the
> lines:
> 
> key "rndckey" {
>       algorithm hmac-md5;
>       secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA==";
> };
> 
> > The only rdnc.conf file I can find is in /etc
> > It looks like this:
> > 
> > options {
> >         default-server  localhost;
> >         default-key     "rndckey";
> > };
> > 
> > server localhost {
> >         key     "rndckey";
> > };
> > 
> > include "/etc/rndc.key";
> > 
> > This is pointing to the wrong file, no? Shouldn't
> it be pointing to the 
> > rndc.key file in /var/named/chroot/etc ????
> 
> /etc/rndc.key should be a symlink to the one in the
> chroot:
> 
> # ls -l /etc/rndc.key
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 30 Jul 20 04:46
> /etc/rndc.key
> -> /var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key
> 
> Paul.
> -- 
> Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:54:00 +0300
> From: Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Running a script at boot [solved]
> To: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx,	For users of Fedora Core
> releases
> 	<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <880dece00508072354410aa9c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On 8/8/05, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > A much simpler way to run a script at boot is to
> put it in the
> > rc.local file.
> 
> Thanks, Aaron, and to all the others who suggested
> this and other
> solutions. After googleing every suggestion that was
> proposed, this
> seemed to be the most 'correct'. It works perfect.
> 
> For the archives: the full path to the rc.local file
> is:
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> 
> Dotan Cohen
>
http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/334/mckennitt_loreena.php
> McKennitt, Loreena Song Lyrics
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:02:10 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: How to select nic while bootup?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <15236.62.2.21.164.1123484530.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hey list,
> 
> i have 2 laptops, with those i can either connect
> via rj-45 or via
> wireless. I use (at this stage) WPA to authenticate
> on wirless.
> 
> The thing is, that fc tries just to init eth0 on
> bootup, not wlan0. So,
> all the following networking functionalities will
> fail.
> 
> How can i:
> 
> - tell the bootprocess to check also for the
> existance of wlan0 ?
> - start wpa_supplicant only if wlan0 needs to be
> booted?
> 
> should i try to handle this issue on the bootscript
> for eth0 itself?
> 
> Thanks for any help
> Roger
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:07:23 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <21886.62.2.21.164.1123484843.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have several subnets, one is with wireless
> (192.168.0.0/24).
> 
> I would like to connect to my internal subnet
> (10.0.0.0/8) using ipsec via
> my firewall, which directs the traffic to internet
> via the default
> gateway. I would also like to use fileservers and
> printers from internal
> lan as i would be in there.
> 
> Is there some help/doc about this issue? I've been
> searching, but did not
> find something self-explanatory ;-)
> 
> How to handle the ipsec-connection with
> system-config-network? how about
> the firewall-computer accepting the connection from
> my client via ipsec?
> 
> Thank you very much for your help. I know, there is
> OpenVPN, but i would
> like to get this running with on-board-ressources
> first...
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:14:55 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123485295.2784.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:46 +0530, Ankush Grover
> wrote:
> > hey friends,
> > 
> >  Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to
> configure CVSWeb on
> > FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried  to
> install it .It gave
> > me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I
> downloaded the
> > perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install
> perl-IPC-Run it says
> > 
> > "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by
> perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch".
> > 
> > I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this
> dependency problem.I
> > also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did
> not installed it.
> > 
> > Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm
> will provide the
> > missing dependencies.
> 
> Your perl package should provide this dependency.
> 
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)'
> perl-5.8.6-15
> 
> What version of perl do you have on your system?
> 
> $ rpm -q perl
> 
> Paul.
> -- 
> Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:17:44 +0200
> From: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42F70718.2070701@xxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> format=flowed
> 
> Gaddis, Jeremy L. wrote:
> ...
> > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> > that my IP address is listed in. 
> 
> Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database
> lookup" field
> on: http://dnsstuff.com/
> 
> Note: Read the comments at the bottom of the page
> after
> the search.
> 
> Mogens
> -- 
> Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
> Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
> Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
> Email: mk@xxxxxx Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:22:22 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123485743.2784.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 00:50 -0500, Gaddis, Jeremy L.
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server
> that I just purchased is
> > on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail
> servers:
> > 
> > Aug  7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]:
> A52F0516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31],
> > delay=10, status=bounced (host
> mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> > Aug  7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]:
> 4CE4E516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> > delay=6, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> > Aug  7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]:
> 657DE516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> > delay=0, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> > 
> > I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to
> use my mail server
> > here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP
> servers as a smarthost.
> > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> > that my IP address is listed in.  I'll have to
> reconfigure Thunderbird
> > when I get to work in the morning, however, and
> again when I get home,
> > etc. (laptop that goes with me).
> 
> Diagnosing such problems is usually easier if you
> say what the actual IP
> address in question is.
> 
> Given that no reference to an external list is
> mentioned in the
> rejection message, it's quite possible that it's a
> local list run by
> redhat themselves for their own use.
> 
> > Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is
> using?  Alternatively,
> > if there's someone from Red Hat who has the
> ability to get the
> > restrictions removed, feel free to contact me
> off-list.
> 
> You might try postmaster at redhat dot com
> 
> Paul.
> -- 
> Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:35:17 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not
> linked to /dev/hda
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123486518.2784.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 06:32 +0200, Andy Pieters
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > This problem started a while ago but I can't
> recall after what.
> > 
> > Now, whenever someone logs in at the console, the
> links to /dev/dvd 
> > and /dev/cdrom aren't made, and I have to do that
> manually.
> > 
> > Is there any service in particular that is suposed
> to make those symlinks or 
> > should the gdm or related take care of that?
> 
> The default udev rules for CD/DVD devices usually
> pick this up, but you
> could try creating a file
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-custom.rules containing:
> 
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hdX", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="dvd
> cdrom"
> 
> Replace "hdX" with the device name that you point
> your symlinks at,
> which from your Subject: would appear to be "hda".
> 
> Paul.
> -- 
> Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:40:42 +0200
> From: Andreas Wahlert <andreas.wahlert@xxxxxx>
> Subject: openwbem
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42F70C7A.5050404@xxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> Hi List,
> 
> 
> i'm searching for an openwbem package for FC3 or
> FC4. But i found on 
> sourceforge only packages for SuSE Sles (Novell) and
> RH1.
> 
> 
> There are any experiences with WBEM under FC out
> there??
> 
> 
> 
> 
> best regards
> 
> 
> 
> andreas
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:43:24 -0500
> From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42F70D1C.5090807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> >> I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> >> that my IP address is listed in. 
> 
> > Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database
> lookup" field
> > on: http://dnsstuff.com/
> 
> Thanks, I hadn't seen that one before.  The IP
> address in question,
> 64.251.22.89 does show up in the SPEWS database. 
> Reading their page
> makes me think that trying to get it removed from
> there would be more
> trouble than I feel like dealing with right now.
> 
> Thanks,
> -j
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy L. Gaddis     <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem."
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 19
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:45:00 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data...
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1123487101.2784.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 07:26 +1000, Mark Knights
> wrote:
> > Here is the yum -y data as requested...
> > 
> > Setting up Update Process
> > Setting up repositories
> > updates-released          100%
> |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> > extras                    100%
> |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00
> > base                      100%
> |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00
> > Reading repository metadata in from local files
> > primary.xml.gz            100%
> |=========================| 136 kB    00:34
> >
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/repodata/primary.xml.gz:
> 
> > [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out
> > Trying other mirror.
> > Error: failure: repodata/primary.xml.gz from
> extras: [Errno 256] No more 
> > mirrors to try.
> 
> Increasing the timeout as suggested by Thomas would
> be a good idea. You
> might also want to try using a more local mirror of
> the Fedora Extras
> repository (the default configuration only uses the
> download.fedora.redhat.com site at the moment, which
> is often very
> busy).
> 
> Try editing /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-extras.repo and
> change it from this:
> 
> [extras]
> name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch
>
#baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
>
mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
> enabled=1
>
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras
> gpgcheck=1
> 
> to this:
> 
> [extras]
> name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch
>
#baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
>
#mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
>
baseurl=http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
> 
>
http://mirror.optus.net/fedora/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
> enabled=1
>
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras
> gpgcheck=1
> 
> Paul.
> -- 
> Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 18, Issue 74
> *******************************************
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com