Paul Howarth wrote:
akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:29:20AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
I use FC2, so the question is resolved for me. But I suppose
I'll eventually go to a later version. While it was available
for me, I used up2date, with the little icon on the "taskbar"
(or whatever it's called in FC). I had no problems with it.
In fact, it appears to be a GUI to yum.
So, why do I see messages here promoting yum over up2date?
IOW, what advantage does yum have for someone simply wanting
to update his packages?
Mike
It is a matter of taste. Since you have discovered it is really the
same program I would choose the on that suits your temperament.
up2date and yum are not the same program. At least, they weren't up
until FC4. In FC4, up2date calls python modules from yum to handle
repomd style sources (which are the default for FC4). The code for
handling other types of repos (e.g. RHN channels, apt, old-style yum
[pre FC4]) is entirely separate code.
The best reason for using yum in FC4 is that it works more reliably
than up2date.
Paul.
But I think that to upgrade from FC3 (or FC2) to FC4, 'yum upgrade'
generate some problems. 'Up2date' I think it doesn't have this problem
(I haven't tested it yet!!!). What do you think about?
---
Liloulinx (http://freealilou/free.fr)
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
