On 8/5/05, Robin Laing <Robin.Laing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Linux? Can you provide the link please. > > After all, this is a linux list. ;) > > Robin Laing I think that he is refering to the Mad Dog version of Firefox, which has limited activeX controls. Apparantly, you can update windows with it. However, in my experience with it to browse IE-only websites, it had no effect. Same stupid limitations. What really gets me is the fact that code does not have to 'support' any browser! It has to be standards-compliant, and assuming that the user is using a standars-compliant web browser, she will be able to use the site. This adding-in of IE-only 'features' I don't understand. What critical function is that activeX doing that cannot be done in a compliant way? Is that feature so critical that if it is not done, then the app cannot perforn it's intended function? Is there an activeX control so critical, that if Microsoft had not invented it, that online preregistration would not be possible? Dotan Cohen http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/425/red_hot_chili_peppers.php Red Hot Chili Peppers Song Lyrics
