On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 11:49 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: > On Thursday, Aug 4th 2005 at 08:24 -0400, quoth Rodolfo Alc�r: > > =>Palm pilot, by the moment, cannot sync apparently due to a bug on > =>udev-0.58-1, FC4, which causes a huge delay on ttyUSB creation, moment > =>by when palm is not polling for sync anymore. You can test it. See > => > =>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161058 > =>seems duplicate of: > => > =>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158809 > => > =>Isnt that your problem? > > Please do not toppost. > > The bug is not in udev. There is a problem in pilot-link in FC4. The > problem also manifests in palms over a fixed serial port. > > You need to back out the pilot-link that comes with FC4 use older fc3 > code. > > Personally, I'm suprised that this has not yet been fixed. Actually, it's a bit more complicated than all that. I believe this has been discussed before, so a search of the archives would probably find additional information, but let me summarize my take on it.... The developer of pilot-link has been putting together a new version dubbed 0.12, but this new version has a new API. Now pilot-link provides the low-level routines for several high level packages, like jpilot, gnome-pilot, etc. While the developers of those other pieces are aware of the new 0.12 API, most are still just starting to re-write their code to utilize it, and do not generally have a timeline. Also, the developer of pilot-link has been pretty emphatic that no distribution should be shipping 0.12 of his code yet, until everyone has ample time to "catch up". So, I suppose the mistake, if you want to call it that, is that the packagers for Fedora Core 4, saw the new version of pilot-link and since we're the bleeding edge, decided to include it on the distribution. Of course, this then breaks all the packages that run on top of it. At the moment, the question becomes, do we as users, and does the Fedora package maintainer take the step back and put us back on 0.11 of pilot-link or try to help the other code "catch up" to the new interface. I believe they are trying the second approach, but it is an awful lot of work hence the huge pause in delivery. Of course, going backwards can create a lot of dependency issues as there are a bunch of packages that utilize the pilot-link API.... Add to this the fact that the evolution conduits that ship with evolution (but use gnome-pilot which in turn uses pilot-link) have had their own set of issues/brokenness and there's lots of confusion running around. Also the myriad of connectivity capabilities for Palm based devices always introduces some fun with udev and some pesky USB issues that are intermittently hitting different releases of the kernel, apparently.... So I think all the responses in this thread have had merit and the OP will need to determine how they want to progress.... Personally I am just using the "new" pilot-link to perform backups of my Palm and ignoring the synchronization capabilities with Evolution, that I used to rely on in FC3..... And, I'm trying to relax and learn how to spell P-A-T-I-E-N-C-E..... :-) Hopefully I'll have full sync'ing again soon (looks like updates-testing has a new gnome-pilot - hmmmm, something to play with this weekend???).... > > => > =>On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 00:22 +0000, William W. Austin wrote: > =>> About a week ago, suddenly my palm pilot (tungsten t3) stopped sync'ing > =>> with one of my computers (usb cradle). I checked the cradle, the > =>> cables, the power, the connectors on the palm pilot, etc. - everything > =>> was fine. Running usbview the device shows up normally. Nothing > =>> unusual in /var/log/messages and dmesg showed nothing odd. I had done > =>> no new rpms for a couple of weeks, so I was at a loss. /dev/ttyUSB[01] > =>> were both created as normal, and one was linked to /dev/pilot. > =>> > > -- > A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. > Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
