Re: swap file vs. swap partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/30/05, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer <ml2news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> menscher@xxxxxxxx (Damian Menscher) writes:
> > A swap partition would be faster (think about it -- no filesystem
> > overhead).
> 
> Not true anymore. There is no overhead for a swap file compared to a swap
> partition:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/801af09eaf08147c/7bbb9d44ece78faf?lnk=st&q=group:*kernel*+swap+file+partition&rnum=1#7bbb9d44ece78faf
> 

Very interesting, thank you. I think that if I can do it, however, I
will go with the swap partition. If I fail, then I will fall back to
the swap file.

Dotan Cohen
http://song-lirics.com/sl/artist/359/morrison-van-lirics.php
Van Morrison Song Lirics


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux