Re: swap file vs. swap partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Dotan Cohen wrote:

I'm now prepearing to either create a swap file or a swap partition. I
am interested in knowing if there is any difference in performance.
Anyone have any experience with this? Thanks.

A swap partition would be faster (think about it -- no filesystem overhead). The only reason for a swap file is if you didn't plan your partitioning scheme properly, and _need_ to add swap at a later date.

Sorry, I don't have specific benchmark numbers for you. I'm not sure how one would even go about benchmarking such a thing.

Oh, you can also have multiple swap partitions, on different drives. If you set them to the same priority, it will use all at the same time. Kinda like a raid0 stripe, but without creating the software raid. If you're concerned about stability, I think you can software raid the drives first, and then create a swap partition on them (haven't actually done this myself, since raid would damage performance).

Damian Menscher
--
-=#| Physics Grad Student & SysAdmin @ U Illinois Urbana-Champaign |#=-
-=#| 488 LLP, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801 Ofc:(217)333-0038 |#=-
-=#| 4602 Beckman, VMIL/MS, Imaging Technology Group:(217)244-3074 |#=-
-=#| <menscher@xxxxxxxx> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Fax:(217)333-9819 |#=-
-=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers. |#=-


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux