Pb whith openldap on fedora core2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!
after installing my openldap and start it,I don´t know why it reply:
ldapsearch -x -D ¨dc=manager,dc=miage,dc=dla¨ -w secret -b ¨¨ -s base
¨objectClass=*¨ namingContexts
ldap_bind: Can't contact LDAP server (81)
I need your help



when I performed this command above 

2005/7/19, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
>         fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Weird high load on server (nodata)
>    2. Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Reuben D. Budiardja)
>    3. Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises (Steven W. Orr)
>    4. Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Michael A. Peters)
>    5. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh)
>    6. addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure
>       (RLLOYDNAVE123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>    7. Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4 (Drew from Zhrodague)
>    8. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh)
>    9. Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3 (Martin, AA6E)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "nodata" <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Weird high load on server
> To: "Dan Track" <dan.track@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <52038.213.164.3.90.1121786149.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hope you experts can help me out here.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Basically I have server running at a very high load 2.44, although
> >> >> > nothing is noticably high when using top. There aren't any
> >> processes
> >> >> > running on the box except the standard linux OS tools. This box is
> >> >> > used for backup, and only becomes active during the night.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Its a compaq dl380 with a raid 5 configuration.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can anyone suggest what I can do to find out why the load is high?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for your help in advance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I bet you have hanging nfs mounts.
> >> >> If the box is constantly at a load of around 2.44, and isn't
> >> sluggish, I
> >> >> wouldn't worry.
> >> >>
> >> >> Look at iostat, sar, etc. to find out why the load is like that.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > I've looked at these but can't see anything. The server doesn't mount
> >> > or export any filesystems using nfs or any other protocol. If it helps
> >> > here are the various outputs:
> >> >
> >> >  uptime
> >> >  14:45:49  up 62 days, 43 min,  2 users,  load average: 1.46, 1.57,
> >> 1.59
> >> >
> >> > sar 5 10
> >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com)     19/07/05
> >> >
> >> > 14:46:02          CPU     %user     %nice   %system     %idle
> >> > 14:46:07          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > 14:46:12          all      0.00      0.00      0.10     99.90
> >> > 14:46:17          all      0.00      0.00      0.10     99.90
> >> > 14:46:22          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > 14:46:27          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > 14:46:32          all      0.00      0.00      0.10     99.90
> >> > 14:46:37          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > 14:46:42          all      0.10      0.00      0.31     99.59
> >> > 14:46:47          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > 14:46:52          all      0.00      0.00      0.00    100.00
> >> > Average:          all      0.01      0.00      0.06     99.93
> >> >
> >> > vmstat -a
> >> > procs                      memory      swap          io     system
> >> > cpu
> >> >  r  b   swpd   free  inact active   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us
> >> sy
> >> > wa id
> >> >  0  0      0  15404 189668 202836    0    0     3     1    0     2  3
> >> 4
> >> > 1  3
> >> >
> >> > free -m
> >> >              total       used       free     shared    buffers
> >> cached
> >> > Mem:           498        483         15          0        128
> >> 301
> >> > -/+ buffers/cache:         53        445
> >> > Swap:         1027          0       1027
> >> >
> >> > iostat
> >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com)     19/07/05
> >> >
> >> > avg-cpu:  %user   %nice    %sys   %idle
> >> >            3.11    0.00    3.72   93.17
> >> >
> >> > Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0    19.68       427.93       279.15 2147483647 1400883506
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p1
> >> >                   0.00         0.22         0.00    1087144       8986
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p2
> >> >                   0.65         3.72        10.24   18680778   51401528
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p3
> >> >                   0.00         0.00         0.00        248          0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p4
> >> >                   0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p5
> >> >                   0.74         3.90         6.88   19570498   34517568
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p6
> >> >                   0.00         0.00         0.00        168          0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p7
> >> >                   0.00         0.00         0.00        168          0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p8
> >> >                  18.29       427.93       262.03 2147483647 1314955424
> >> >
> >> > top
> >> >  14:47:51  up 62 days, 45 min,  2 users,  load average: 1.73, 1.61,
> >> 1.59
> >> > 61 processes: 60 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> >> > CPU states:  cpu    user    nice  system    irq  softirq  iowait
> >> idle
> >> >            total    0.4%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
> >> 99.5%
> >> >            cpu00    0.9%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
> >> 99.0%
> >> >            cpu01    0.0%    0.0%    0.0%   0.0%     0.0%    0.0%
> >> 100.0%
> >> > Mem:   510400k av,  495224k used,   15176k free,       0k shrd,
> >> 132000k
> >> > buff
> >> >                     203040k actv,  182824k in_d,    6852k in_c
> >> > Swap: 1052592k av,       0k used, 1052592k free
> >> 308668k
> >> > cached
> >> >
> >> >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU
> >> COMMAND
> >> > 13100 root      20   0  1092 1092   888 R     0.4  0.2   0:00   0 top
> >> >     1 root      15   0   512  512   452 S     0.0  0.1   1:18   0 init
> >> >     2 root      RT   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> > migration/0
> >> >     3 root      RT   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   1
> >> > migration/1
> >> >     4 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   1
> >> keventd
> >> >     5 root      34  19     0    0     0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> > ksoftirqd/0
> >> >     6 root      34  19     0    0     0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00   1
> >> > ksoftirqd/1
> >> >     9 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> bdflush
> >> >     7 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0  70:21   0
> >> kswapd
> >> >     8 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0  23:07   1
> >> kscand
> >> >    10 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   3:30   0
> >> kupdated
> >> >    11 root      25   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> > mdrecoveryd
> >> >    18 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> ahc_dv_0
> >> >    19 root      25   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> > scsi_eh_0
> >> >    23 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   2:30   1
> >> > kjournald
> >> >   192 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00   0
> >> > kjournald
> >> >   193 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0  13:57   1
> >> > kjournald
> >> >   194 root      15   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   4:18   0
> >> > kjournald
> >> >   568 root      15   0   576  576   492 S     0.0  0.1   0:57   0
> >> syslogd
> >> >   572 root      15   0   472  472   408 S     0.0  0.0   0:00   1
> >> klogd
> >> >   582 root      15   0   452  452   388 S     0.0  0.0   5:33   1
> >> > irqbalance
> >> >   599 rpc       15   0   600  600   524 S     0.0  0.1   0:22   0
> >> portmap
> >> >   618 rpcuser   25   0   720  720   644 S     0.0  0.1   0:00   0
> >> > rpc.statd
> >> >   629 root      15   0   400  400   344 S     0.0  0.0   0:18   0
> >> mdadm
> >> >   712 root      15   0  3160 3160  2024 S     0.0  0.6   3:22   1
> >> snmpd
> >> >   713 root      25   0  3160 3160  2024 S     0.0  0.6   0:00   0
> >> snmpd
> >> >   722 root      15   0  1576 1576  1324 S     0.0  0.3   4:58   1 sshd
> >> >
> >> > Anyone have any ideas. Literally the box is sitting there not doing
> >> > anything that has been scheduled.
> >> >
> >> > This happens occassionally then the load spontaneously goes down. Do
> >> > you reckon it has something to do with the raid 5?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >>
> >> ps auxw | grep " D "
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get the following:
> >
> > ps auxw | grep " D "
> > root     15802  0.0  0.1  3688  660 pts/0    S    16:06   0:00 grep  D
> >
> > Dan
> >
> 
> Then it's probably not a problem of waiting for IO.
> 
> Here are the other codes, you might want to try S or T:
> 
> PROCESS STATE CODES
> Here are the different values that the s, stat and state output specifiers
> (header "STAT" or "S") will display to describe the state of a process.
> D    Uninterruptible sleep (usually IO)
> R    Running or runnable (on run queue)
> S    Interruptible sleep (waiting for an event to complete)
> T    Stopped, either by a job control signal or because it is being traced.
> W    paging (not valid since the 2.6.xx kernel)
> X    dead (should never be seen)
> Z    Defunct ("zombie") process, terminated but not reaped by its parent.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:19:45 -0400
> From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Linux-NTFS Write Capability
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <200507191119.45373.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"
> 
> 
> Hello,
> Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can
> write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even
> installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition.
> 
> If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing
> to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll
> try it out.
> 
> Thanks for any info.
> RDB
> 
> --
> Reuben D. Budiardja
> Dept. Physics and Astronomy
> University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises
> To: Sharon Kimble <skimble04@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191126050.11242@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> On Tuesday, Jul 19th 2005 at 16:03 +0100, quoth Sharon Kimble:
> 
> =>On 19/07/05, Christopher A. Williams <chrisw01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> =>> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 03:31 -0400, fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> =>> > On Monday 18 July 2005 16:42, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> =>> >
> =>> > > I hope it helps others. Its a cobbling togethor of other folks ideas from
> =>> > > this list, but it works!
> =>> >
> =>> > Is it sync'ing using kpilot, gnome-pilot, or just pilot-link?  I've been able
> =>> > to get pilot-link to sync for a while, but gnome-pilot and kpilot have been
> =>> > crashing.
> =>>
> =>> ...And after setting this up, gnome-pilot continues to die on my system.
> =>> These changes are convenient though in that:
> =>>
> =>> 1) They do set up permissions properly for syncing (solving a set of
> =>> udev issues)
> =>>
> =>> 2) Set up the /dev/pilot symlink to whatever ttyUSB port udev creates
> =>>
> =>> Since the default is point to /dev/pilot for syncing, this is a nice
> =>> little addition. I heard that the crashes in kpilot and gnome-pilot were
> =>> upstream bugs that are yet to be fixed. Anyone have status on these -
> =>> gnome-pilot in particular?
> =>>
> =>Chris.
> =>Another variable here is that I use kde from the kde-redhat
> =>repository, and I tend to install books to read on my palm by just
> =>doing a 'fast-sync'. Doing a 'full-sync' it does crash but I haven't
> =>worked out where and what the problem is yet.
> =>
> =>Sharon.
> =>
> 
> As has been discussed on the jpilot list and also posted here:
> 
> pilot-link is broken under FC4. The solution is to go with the pilot-link
> from FC3. Get the old rpms and install them. If you use jpilot
> 
> rpm -ivh --force --relocate /usr=/opt/jpilot jpilot-0.99.7-2.i386.rpm \
>    pilot-link-0.11.8-8.i386.rpm
> 
> 
> --
> Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
> happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
> Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
> individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
> steveo at syslang.net
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:32:14 -0700
> From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1121787134.2907.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:19 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can
> > write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even
> > installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition.
> >
> > If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing
> > to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll
> > try it out.
> 
> AFAIK the ntfs module can only write if the size of the file does not
> change, and it has to be compiled with that rather useless option.
> 
> As far as writing to NTFS - I think the only option is through samba
> where the ntfs partition is smb shared from a windows host.
> 
> There might be a commercial driver. I think I remember seeing one sold
> somewhere ...
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:45:38 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: SELinux update error
> To: Shane Lahey <s.lahey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        For users of Fedora Core
>         releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42DD2022.4020605@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Shane Lahey wrote:
> 
> >Hello Steven,
> >
> >Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error:
> >
> >SS> Updating  : selinux-policy-targeted
> >SS> ######################### [1/6]
> >SS> sepol_genbools_array:  unknown boolean user_ping
> >SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy:  Warning!  Error while setting booleans:  Invalid
> >SS> argument
> >
> >SS> --
> >
> >SS>    Steve
> >
> >
> >yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know
> >if there is any reason to worry about this error?
> >
> >
> >
> No, it is indicating a boolean that has been removed.  This
> Warning/Error message has been fixed in the latest upstream
> load_policy code.  user_ping boolean does not work in targeted policy,
> since the user is unconfined it makes no sense to be
> there.
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:46 EDT
> From: RLLOYDNAVE123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <67.49186517.300e79ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I am searching for open source multimedia and 3-graphic tools and software
> development tools that will run with Fedora 4 linux.
> 
> I have been seeing some apparent problems with applications that ran with
> older versions of Fedora that will no longer run with Fedora 4.
> The problem may be associated with using GCC 4.0 , although I am not sure.
> 
> In any case here is a list of free applications that I have tried to install
> so far.
> 
> Successes -
>   Borland Java Builder - free version
>    Audacity - sound editor
>    Argo UML   - universal model language tool
>    Flight Gear -  airplane simulator
>    OpenScenegraph - 3-D graphics tool set
>     SGI Performer - 3-D graphics  - limited free demo version
>     MainActor - video editor - limited free demo version
>     xine  - DVD player
> 
> Failures -
>   Blender 3-D editor - compiles but does not seem to work properly.
>   Open Scene graph Editor  - will not compile under GCC 4.0
>   Virtual Terrain Builder  - will not compile under GCC 4.0
>    Timidity - Midi player - compiles but will not play midi files ,
>                   does not create timidity.cfg file.
>                   It appears that "sound fonts" are missing.
> 
>   Also the built in  kmidi  player does not generate any sound output.
>   I have upgraded the Fedora kernel and installed the latest version of alsa,
>   but it does not seem to fix the midi problem.
> 
>   Borland kylix   - I have not had any success with this C++ development tool
>   since I upgraded from Fedora1. There are rumors that Borland
>   may release an upgrade to kylix  , but the rumors may have no substance.
> 
>   Has any one had success with any of the applications listed above??
> 
>    So far the audacity sound editor is the only one that I have actually used
>    for anything. It seems to work well and I would recommend it.
> 
>     I have had extensive difficulties with missing dependency libraries ,
>     and incompatible versions that generate undefined linker and run time
>     symbols. Overall there seems to be a lot of incompatibilities with
>     source packages that were built for versions of linux other than Fedora 4.
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050719/23393a6b/attachment.htm
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Drew from Zhrodague <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191142170.32325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> >>      We've got several IBM Blade Center Chassis, and HS20 blades in
> >> 'em. We're trying to install FC4 onto these things, but when we PXE boot,
> >> the things load the kernel, and instantly panics. Booting from CD has the
> >> same effect.
> >>
> >>      We're using the kernel from the distro, and it doesn't matter if
> >> we do i386 or x86_64.
> >>
> >>      I'd include a crash dump, but the wacky built-in management
> >> doesn't seem to allow that!
> >
> > Serial cable?
> 
>         Good idea on any other type of computer on the planet, except
> these. There's no place to plug it in!
> 
> --
> 
> Drew from Zhrodague
> drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.WiFiMaps.com
> http://moblog.zhrodague.net
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:47:52 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: SELinux update error
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <42DD20A8.2020102@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 21:01 -0230, Shane Lahey wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello Steven,
> >>
> >>Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >>SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error:
> >>
> >>SS> Updating  : selinux-policy-targeted
> >>SS> ######################### [1/6]
> >>SS> sepol_genbools_array:  unknown boolean user_ping
> >>SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy:  Warning!  Error while setting booleans:  Invalid
> >>SS> argument
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know
> >>if there is any reason to worry about this error?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163481
> >
> >The maintainer in his great wisdom had preferred to close it as NOTABUG
> >without providing a fixed rpm, so this PR has become hard to find for
> >users searching bugzilla ;)
> >
> >Ralf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I have changed it to NextRelease if that will make you happier.  It is a
> badly worded warning message.
> 
> Dan
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:56:53 -0400
> From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3
> To: Fernando Fern?ndez Pedraza <fpedraza@xxxxxxxxx>,
>         fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <6a2b366e050719085655e791f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Up to the latest kernel release (FC3), I have had fairly little
> trouble syncing my Palm devices using jpilot, although it was touch
> and go when udev came along.  (Remind me why this was such a good
> idea?) I have never got the "advanced" kde/gnome/evolution working
> satisfactorily. YMMV.
> 
> This is now Bugilla 163615 FWIW!
> 
> -Martin
> 
> On 7/19/05, Fernando Fern�ndez Pedraza <fpedraza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello Martin, just a comment from another Fedora/Palm sufferer.
> >
> >  It looks like support of Palm devices under Fedora is going to HECK.
> >  I bought a Treo 600 while using FC4t3 and I have never been able to sync,
> > even with the released FC4. Many people report the same problem with this
> > and other handhelds
> >
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159072)
> >
> >  Do RedHat/Fedora developers hate Palm for some reason???
> >
> > On 7/19/05, Martin, AA6E <martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > After the recent update to kernel 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3, I am having
> > > trouble with Palm syncing via USB.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** las m�quinas son amigas **
> 
> 
> --
> martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx
> http://blog.aa6e.net
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 17, Issue 230
> ********************************************
> 


-- 
etudiant miagiste tel:9363020 !


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux