Hi! after installing my openldap and start it,I don´t know why it reply: ldapsearch -x -D ¨dc=manager,dc=miage,dc=dla¨ -w secret -b ¨¨ -s base ¨objectClass=*¨ namingContexts ldap_bind: Can't contact LDAP server (81) I need your help when I performed this command above 2005/7/19, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Weird high load on server (nodata) > 2. Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Reuben D. Budiardja) > 3. Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises (Steven W. Orr) > 4. Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Michael A. Peters) > 5. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh) > 6. addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure > (RLLOYDNAVE123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) > 7. Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4 (Drew from Zhrodague) > 8. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh) > 9. Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3 (Martin, AA6E) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:15:49 +0200 (CEST) > From: "nodata" <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Weird high load on server > To: "Dan Track" <dan.track@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <52038.213.164.3.90.1121786149.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Guys, > >> >> > > >> >> > Hope you experts can help me out here. > >> >> > > >> >> > Basically I have server running at a very high load 2.44, although > >> >> > nothing is noticably high when using top. There aren't any > >> processes > >> >> > running on the box except the standard linux OS tools. This box is > >> >> > used for backup, and only becomes active during the night. > >> >> > > >> >> > Its a compaq dl380 with a raid 5 configuration. > >> >> > > >> >> > Can anyone suggest what I can do to find out why the load is high? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks for your help in advance. > >> >> > > >> >> > Dan > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I bet you have hanging nfs mounts. > >> >> If the box is constantly at a load of around 2.44, and isn't > >> sluggish, I > >> >> wouldn't worry. > >> >> > >> >> Look at iostat, sar, etc. to find out why the load is like that. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > I've looked at these but can't see anything. The server doesn't mount > >> > or export any filesystems using nfs or any other protocol. If it helps > >> > here are the various outputs: > >> > > >> > uptime > >> > 14:45:49 up 62 days, 43 min, 2 users, load average: 1.46, 1.57, > >> 1.59 > >> > > >> > sar 5 10 > >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com) 19/07/05 > >> > > >> > 14:46:02 CPU %user %nice %system %idle > >> > 14:46:07 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > 14:46:12 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90 > >> > 14:46:17 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90 > >> > 14:46:22 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > 14:46:27 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > 14:46:32 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90 > >> > 14:46:37 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > 14:46:42 all 0.10 0.00 0.31 99.59 > >> > 14:46:47 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > 14:46:52 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 > >> > Average: all 0.01 0.00 0.06 99.93 > >> > > >> > vmstat -a > >> > procs memory swap io system > >> > cpu > >> > r b swpd free inact active si so bi bo in cs us > >> sy > >> > wa id > >> > 0 0 0 15404 189668 202836 0 0 3 1 0 2 3 > >> 4 > >> > 1 3 > >> > > >> > free -m > >> > total used free shared buffers > >> cached > >> > Mem: 498 483 15 0 128 > >> 301 > >> > -/+ buffers/cache: 53 445 > >> > Swap: 1027 0 1027 > >> > > >> > iostat > >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com) 19/07/05 > >> > > >> > avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %idle > >> > 3.11 0.00 3.72 93.17 > >> > > >> > Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0 19.68 427.93 279.15 2147483647 1400883506 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p1 > >> > 0.00 0.22 0.00 1087144 8986 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p2 > >> > 0.65 3.72 10.24 18680778 51401528 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p3 > >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 248 0 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p4 > >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p5 > >> > 0.74 3.90 6.88 19570498 34517568 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p6 > >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 168 0 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p7 > >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 168 0 > >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p8 > >> > 18.29 427.93 262.03 2147483647 1314955424 > >> > > >> > top > >> > 14:47:51 up 62 days, 45 min, 2 users, load average: 1.73, 1.61, > >> 1.59 > >> > 61 processes: 60 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > >> > CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait > >> idle > >> > total 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% > >> 99.5% > >> > cpu00 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% > >> 99.0% > >> > cpu01 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% > >> 100.0% > >> > Mem: 510400k av, 495224k used, 15176k free, 0k shrd, > >> 132000k > >> > buff > >> > 203040k actv, 182824k in_d, 6852k in_c > >> > Swap: 1052592k av, 0k used, 1052592k free > >> 308668k > >> > cached > >> > > >> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU > >> COMMAND > >> > 13100 root 20 0 1092 1092 888 R 0.4 0.2 0:00 0 top > >> > 1 root 15 0 512 512 452 S 0.0 0.1 1:18 0 init > >> > 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> > migration/0 > >> > 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 > >> > migration/1 > >> > 4 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 > >> keventd > >> > 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> > ksoftirqd/0 > >> > 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 > >> > ksoftirqd/1 > >> > 9 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> bdflush > >> > 7 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 70:21 0 > >> kswapd > >> > 8 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 23:07 1 > >> kscand > >> > 10 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 3:30 0 > >> kupdated > >> > 11 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> > mdrecoveryd > >> > 18 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> ahc_dv_0 > >> > 19 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> > scsi_eh_0 > >> > 23 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 2:30 1 > >> > kjournald > >> > 192 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 > >> > kjournald > >> > 193 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 13:57 1 > >> > kjournald > >> > 194 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 4:18 0 > >> > kjournald > >> > 568 root 15 0 576 576 492 S 0.0 0.1 0:57 0 > >> syslogd > >> > 572 root 15 0 472 472 408 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 > >> klogd > >> > 582 root 15 0 452 452 388 S 0.0 0.0 5:33 1 > >> > irqbalance > >> > 599 rpc 15 0 600 600 524 S 0.0 0.1 0:22 0 > >> portmap > >> > 618 rpcuser 25 0 720 720 644 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 0 > >> > rpc.statd > >> > 629 root 15 0 400 400 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:18 0 > >> mdadm > >> > 712 root 15 0 3160 3160 2024 S 0.0 0.6 3:22 1 > >> snmpd > >> > 713 root 25 0 3160 3160 2024 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 0 > >> snmpd > >> > 722 root 15 0 1576 1576 1324 S 0.0 0.3 4:58 1 sshd > >> > > >> > Anyone have any ideas. Literally the box is sitting there not doing > >> > anything that has been scheduled. > >> > > >> > This happens occassionally then the load spontaneously goes down. Do > >> > you reckon it has something to do with the raid 5? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Dan > >> > > >> > >> ps auxw | grep " D " > >> > > Hi, > > > > I get the following: > > > > ps auxw | grep " D " > > root 15802 0.0 0.1 3688 660 pts/0 S 16:06 0:00 grep D > > > > Dan > > > > Then it's probably not a problem of waiting for IO. > > Here are the other codes, you might want to try S or T: > > PROCESS STATE CODES > Here are the different values that the s, stat and state output specifiers > (header "STAT" or "S") will display to describe the state of a process. > D Uninterruptible sleep (usually IO) > R Running or runnable (on run queue) > S Interruptible sleep (waiting for an event to complete) > T Stopped, either by a job control signal or because it is being traced. > W paging (not valid since the 2.6.xx kernel) > X dead (should never be seen) > Z Defunct ("zombie") process, terminated but not reaped by its parent. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:19:45 -0400 > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Linux-NTFS Write Capability > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200507191119.45373.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > Hello, > Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can > write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even > installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition. > > If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing > to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll > try it out. > > Thanks for any info. > RDB > > -- > Reuben D. Budiardja > Dept. Physics and Astronomy > University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:28:31 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises > To: Sharon Kimble <skimble04@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191126050.11242@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Tuesday, Jul 19th 2005 at 16:03 +0100, quoth Sharon Kimble: > > =>On 19/07/05, Christopher A. Williams <chrisw01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > =>> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 03:31 -0400, fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > =>> > On Monday 18 July 2005 16:42, Sharon Kimble wrote: > =>> > > =>> > > I hope it helps others. Its a cobbling togethor of other folks ideas from > =>> > > this list, but it works! > =>> > > =>> > Is it sync'ing using kpilot, gnome-pilot, or just pilot-link? I've been able > =>> > to get pilot-link to sync for a while, but gnome-pilot and kpilot have been > =>> > crashing. > =>> > =>> ...And after setting this up, gnome-pilot continues to die on my system. > =>> These changes are convenient though in that: > =>> > =>> 1) They do set up permissions properly for syncing (solving a set of > =>> udev issues) > =>> > =>> 2) Set up the /dev/pilot symlink to whatever ttyUSB port udev creates > =>> > =>> Since the default is point to /dev/pilot for syncing, this is a nice > =>> little addition. I heard that the crashes in kpilot and gnome-pilot were > =>> upstream bugs that are yet to be fixed. Anyone have status on these - > =>> gnome-pilot in particular? > =>> > =>Chris. > =>Another variable here is that I use kde from the kde-redhat > =>repository, and I tend to install books to read on my palm by just > =>doing a 'fast-sync'. Doing a 'full-sync' it does crash but I haven't > =>worked out where and what the problem is yet. > => > =>Sharon. > => > > As has been discussed on the jpilot list and also posted here: > > pilot-link is broken under FC4. The solution is to go with the pilot-link > from FC3. Get the old rpms and install them. If you use jpilot > > rpm -ivh --force --relocate /usr=/opt/jpilot jpilot-0.99.7-2.i386.rpm \ > pilot-link-0.11.8-8.i386.rpm > > > -- > Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. > happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 > Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 > individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? > steveo at syslang.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:32:14 -0700 > From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1121787134.2907.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:19 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > Hello, > > Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can > > write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even > > installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition. > > > > If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing > > to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll > > try it out. > > AFAIK the ntfs module can only write if the size of the file does not > change, and it has to be compiled with that rather useless option. > > As far as writing to NTFS - I think the only option is through samba > where the ntfs partition is smb shared from a windows host. > > There might be a commercial driver. I think I remember seeing one sold > somewhere ... > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:45:38 -0400 > From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SELinux update error > To: Shane Lahey <s.lahey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core > releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42DD2022.4020605@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Shane Lahey wrote: > > >Hello Steven, > > > >Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote: > > > >SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error: > > > >SS> Updating : selinux-policy-targeted > >SS> ######################### [1/6] > >SS> sepol_genbools_array: unknown boolean user_ping > >SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy: Warning! Error while setting booleans: Invalid > >SS> argument > > > >SS> -- > > > >SS> Steve > > > > > >yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know > >if there is any reason to worry about this error? > > > > > > > No, it is indicating a boolean that has been removed. This > Warning/Error message has been fixed in the latest upstream > load_policy code. user_ping boolean does not work in targeted policy, > since the user is unconfined it makes no sense to be > there. > > > -- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:46 EDT > From: RLLOYDNAVE123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <67.49186517.300e79ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I am searching for open source multimedia and 3-graphic tools and software > development tools that will run with Fedora 4 linux. > > I have been seeing some apparent problems with applications that ran with > older versions of Fedora that will no longer run with Fedora 4. > The problem may be associated with using GCC 4.0 , although I am not sure. > > In any case here is a list of free applications that I have tried to install > so far. > > Successes - > Borland Java Builder - free version > Audacity - sound editor > Argo UML - universal model language tool > Flight Gear - airplane simulator > OpenScenegraph - 3-D graphics tool set > SGI Performer - 3-D graphics - limited free demo version > MainActor - video editor - limited free demo version > xine - DVD player > > Failures - > Blender 3-D editor - compiles but does not seem to work properly. > Open Scene graph Editor - will not compile under GCC 4.0 > Virtual Terrain Builder - will not compile under GCC 4.0 > Timidity - Midi player - compiles but will not play midi files , > does not create timidity.cfg file. > It appears that "sound fonts" are missing. > > Also the built in kmidi player does not generate any sound output. > I have upgraded the Fedora kernel and installed the latest version of alsa, > but it does not seem to fix the midi problem. > > Borland kylix - I have not had any success with this C++ development tool > since I upgraded from Fedora1. There are rumors that Borland > may release an upgrade to kylix , but the rumors may have no substance. > > Has any one had success with any of the applications listed above?? > > So far the audacity sound editor is the only one that I have actually used > for anything. It seems to work well and I would recommend it. > > I have had extensive difficulties with missing dependency libraries , > and incompatible versions that generate undefined linker and run time > symbols. Overall there seems to be a lot of incompatibilities with > source packages that were built for versions of linux other than Fedora 4. > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050719/23393a6b/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:01 -0400 (EDT) > From: Drew from Zhrodague <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191142170.32325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > >> We've got several IBM Blade Center Chassis, and HS20 blades in > >> 'em. We're trying to install FC4 onto these things, but when we PXE boot, > >> the things load the kernel, and instantly panics. Booting from CD has the > >> same effect. > >> > >> We're using the kernel from the distro, and it doesn't matter if > >> we do i386 or x86_64. > >> > >> I'd include a crash dump, but the wacky built-in management > >> doesn't seem to allow that! > > > > Serial cable? > > Good idea on any other type of computer on the planet, except > these. There's no place to plug it in! > > -- > > Drew from Zhrodague > drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.WiFiMaps.com > http://moblog.zhrodague.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:47:52 -0400 > From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SELinux update error > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <42DD20A8.2020102@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > >On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 21:01 -0230, Shane Lahey wrote: > > > > > >>Hello Steven, > >> > >>Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote: > >> > >>SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error: > >> > >>SS> Updating : selinux-policy-targeted > >>SS> ######################### [1/6] > >>SS> sepol_genbools_array: unknown boolean user_ping > >>SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy: Warning! Error while setting booleans: Invalid > >>SS> argument > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know > >>if there is any reason to worry about this error? > >> > >> > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163481 > > > >The maintainer in his great wisdom had preferred to close it as NOTABUG > >without providing a fixed rpm, so this PR has become hard to find for > >users searching bugzilla ;) > > > >Ralf > > > > > > > > > I have changed it to NextRelease if that will make you happier. It is a > badly worded warning message. > > Dan > > -- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:56:53 -0400 > From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3 > To: Fernando Fern?ndez Pedraza <fpedraza@xxxxxxxxx>, > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <6a2b366e050719085655e791f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Up to the latest kernel release (FC3), I have had fairly little > trouble syncing my Palm devices using jpilot, although it was touch > and go when udev came along. (Remind me why this was such a good > idea?) I have never got the "advanced" kde/gnome/evolution working > satisfactorily. YMMV. > > This is now Bugilla 163615 FWIW! > > -Martin > > On 7/19/05, Fernando Fern�ndez Pedraza <fpedraza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Martin, just a comment from another Fedora/Palm sufferer. > > > > It looks like support of Palm devices under Fedora is going to HECK. > > I bought a Treo 600 while using FC4t3 and I have never been able to sync, > > even with the released FC4. Many people report the same problem with this > > and other handhelds > > > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159072) > > > > Do RedHat/Fedora developers hate Palm for some reason??? > > > > On 7/19/05, Martin, AA6E <martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > After the recent update to kernel 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3, I am having > > > trouble with Palm syncing via USB. > > > > > > > > > -- > > ** las m�quinas son amigas ** > > > -- > martin.ewing@xxxxxxxxx > http://blog.aa6e.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 17, Issue 230 > ******************************************** > -- etudiant miagiste tel:9363020 !
