Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 02:33:56 +0530
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050512 Red Hat/1.7.8-1.1.3.1

Hi

It works on FC3 without problems and that's gcc32. The "broken"theory seems to fall apart there. Thanks for the attempt though, itis appreciated.

If it works with GCC 3.2 thats exactly what compat-gcc-32 packagesupplies. I dont see a problem


regards
Rahul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
  - From: Richard Kelsch

References:
- Downgrading to PHP4?
  - From: liu chang
- FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
  - From: Richard Kelsch
- Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
  - From: Richard Kelsch