Re: Yum repros wanted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:36 -0500, John Bray wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 21:21 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:38:53 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> > 
> > > Extras did surprise me when, the first time I configured my system (back 
> > > in FC3) to use extras, I got twenty-two updates of packages (like 
> > > anjuta) that I had installed from dag or at-stable or freshrpms. So 
> > > their selection is moving up. I'd like to see the process move a bit 
> > > faster, that's all.
> > 
> > Which process? Packagers at Fedora Extras can update their packages any
> > day any time. There is no process which slows them down. Except the people
> > who need to GPG sign the built binaries and push them into the repository.
> 
> FORKED TOUNGUE ALERT!  FORKED TOUNGUE ALERT!  FORKED TOUNGUE ALERT!

Hi John,

I don't understand the above.  Maybe theres some humor that I'm missing
or perhaps you're just trolling.

In any case, speaking as someone who maintains a few (very few) packages
in Fedora Extras, I think Michael's comments are correct.  I can and
have edited packages at my convenience (through CVS) and received builds
and updates within a reasonable time frame.  And I'm optimistic that the
FE maintainer experience will get better as the build system improves.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3@xxxxxxx                ed@xxxxxxx
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux