Am Do, den 23.06.2005 schrieb Kam Leo um 23:48: > > > I wonder a bit as I always thought /etc/grub.conf exists only for > > > convenience - better to be recognized as conf(iguration) file for grub. > > > And that the real configuration used by grub is only > > > /boot/grub/menu.lst, to which /etc/grub.conf on Fedora by default is a > > > symlink. > > > > > > Alexander > > When I do 'ls -ap /boot/grub' it indicates that @menu.lst is the symlink and > > grub.conf the original. Am I misinterpreting this? > > > > Tom > On my system /boot/grub/menu.list is a symbolic link to > /boot/grub/grub/conf and /etc/grub.conf is symbolically linked to > /boot/grub/grub.conf . Did the OP at some point delete the original > grub.conf in /boot/grub? O, I was wrong. So /boot/grub/grub.conf is the real file with the configuration content. Time for consulting the grub documentation. $ ls -ll /boot/grub/menu.lst /boot/grub/grub.conf /etc/grub.conf -rw------- 1 root root 884 24. Mai 00:38 /boot/grub/grub.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 30. Mai 2004 /boot/grub/menu.lst -> ./grub.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 30. Mai 2004 /etc/grub.conf -> ../boot/grub/grub.conf Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp Serendipity 23:55:10 up 2 days, 8:09, load average: 0.13, 0.17, 0.15
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
