Am Do, den 23.06.2005 schrieb Felipe Contreras um 17:29: > On 6/21/05, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The problem I'm having right now is that grub starts in the shell, as > > if no grub.conf existed... but there it is... and it seems to be ok. > > I'm going to answer myself here. Since no one in #fedora nor > fedora-list answered or cared to suggest anything; I tried > #lfs-support, and thanks to jbit I found what the problem was. > > For some reason grub is not following symlinks on ReiserFS, I don't > know if it's a problem specific with the grub compiled in Fedora but > making /etc/grub.conf a normal file it worked fine. > Felipe Contreras I wonder a bit as I always thought /etc/grub.conf exists only for convenience - better to be recognized as conf(iguration) file for grub. And that the real configuration used by grub is only /boot/grub/menu.lst, to which /etc/grub.conf on Fedora by default is a symlink. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp Serendipity 18:08:25 up 2 days, 2:22, load average: 1.50, 2.11, 2.26
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
