Am Mo, den 20.06.2005 schrieb Claude Jones um 15:46: > > > DHCPD is refusing to start, manually, or as set to run at boot. Is this a > > > SELINUX setting? Any advice would be greatly appreciated as this machine > > > has to running in a couple of hours > > > > If it's an SELinux issue then you should be seeing audit errors in the > > logs when you try to start the daemon, and "setenforce 0" would allow it > > to work (this is a quick test to determine if it's an SELinux issue, I'm > > not recommending this as a long-term fix). > > > > Paul. > Saw this at about 4am, and tried it, and it worked. So, I guess that begs the > question of configuring SELINUX to allow DHCPD, or something else? I've had > about 3 hours sleep, but at least the machine is running. Thanks. > Claude Jones https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2005-June/msg00145.html Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp Serendipity 15:52:55 up 27 days, 14:30, load average: 0.21, 0.16, 0.15
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
