Bob,
the ISO's or a tleast some are very screwed up it more a sysimage thing, just type spme BS on the line like where you type linux text <enter>
type text <enter> yes yes thats an error but when it says thats an error you can then type in linux text <enter> and fof you go, not very good for n official release to be this fscked I know but it seems tyo be a sign of things to come with fedora over past couple years teh guys who do QC should be sacked.
Cheers
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Bob Parker wrote:
Thomas Taylor wrote:Thanks Tom,On Monday 20 June 2005 01:01, Bob Parker wrote:
I downloaded the FC4 i386 cd isos which passed the sha1 test. I then burnt 4 cds and sha1 tested the isos on the cdr which all passed the sha1 test yet again. At install time my friend ran mediacheck on all 4 cdrs, he reports all failed the mediacheck. Next I had him check the sha1sum on cd #1 which yielded the same sum as published by the mirrors, so what gives?
Thanks Bob
Hi Bob:
If the cds pass the sha1sum then they should be good. Skip the media check, it returns a bad result depending how the cds were burned (with/without 0 padding). This has been the situration since at least FC3.
HTH, Tom
They were burned with default settings so 2 x 2048 byte sectors of null padding is on them.
Regards Bob
-- Cheers Res
