On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 06:49:28 +0200 Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Argh, indeed my fault. I've mis-read WAG511 for WG511. W_A_G511 is > indeed Atheros-based. > Sorry. One letter... :-Z And who's to say that next week Netgear won't come out with another version of the WAG511 that's based on a completely different chipset? It's not like they haven't done this sort of thing before ... :) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Charles Taylor <tomalek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> * Chemistry instructor / Mad scientist / Linux enthusiast! -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Web: http://home.mindspring.com/~charletiv/ --------------------------------------------------------------------
