Dave Jones - Thu, Jun 02 2005 15:01:20 -0400:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Christoph Franke wrote:
> > Dave Jones - Thu, Jun 02 2005 14:25:48 -0400:
> >
> > > Is it repeatable ? Does it behave again if you boot with
> > > exec-shield=0 ? or exec-shield-randomize=0 ?
> >
> > Yes, it is repeatable, teamspeak segfaults on every start. Ntpd
> > segfaults on both build -30 and -31 during boot, but can be restarted
> > afterwards. Will try a boot with exec-shield=0 tomorrow morning and pass
> > through the results.
>
> Ok.
Ok, I did a reboot with parameter exec-shield=0 and teamspeak started
right away. Ntpd is unchanged, here is the output
3 Jun 06:29:10 ntpd[4293]: synchronized to 192.53.103.104, stratum 1
3 Jun 06:46:04 ntpd[4293]: synchronized to 192.53.103.103, stratum 1
3 Jun 07:15:59 ntpd[4293]: ntpd exiting on signal 15
3 Jun 07:18:40 ntpd[3066]: signal_no_reset: signal 17 had flags
4000000
3 Jun 07:18:42 ntpd[3066]: signal_no_reset: signal 14 had flags
4000000
A restart though works as already mentioned.
> > Besides: may I ask if your plans to release a 2.6.12 kernel rpm for FC3
> > are stil valid?
>
> Sure, but from the looks of things, thats still a way into the future,
> so I'd expect to see antoher 2.6.11 based errata for FC3 first.
> Upstream still seems a few weeks off (I've heard a few rumours about
> a -rc6 being planned). FC4 will get a rebase to 2.6.12, and a week
> or so later (if all goes well), I'll do a backport of the FC4 kernel
> (minus bits like Xen) to FC3, and see what breaks.
Ok. Thanks in advance.
Christoph
--
| GnuPG Public Key: http://www.thefranke.net/public.asc |
| The BOFH Archive at: http://bofh.ntk.net/Bastard.html |
| Registered Linux User: 250439 - http://counter.li.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
