On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 23:25, Christopher A. Williams wrote: > I have been aware of this since it started. The issue in this case was, > as you mentioned, that updates for RHL 7.3 are not a priority compared > to other things and they were cracked once due to an un-patched > vulnerability. > > Also, in this case, the required applications worked flawlessly on > Fedora Core 3. They just didn't want to believe / trust it and opted to > return to an un-patched RHL system with the same overall configuration > as had been cracked before. Kind of a "devil you know vs. devil you > don't" mentality. Centos 3 probably wouldn't frighten the natives quite so badly - and it is still getting regular updates promptly after they are released for RHEL3. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
