-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Danny Terweij wrote:
| --> Finished Dependency Resolution | Error: missing dep: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) for pkg apt ... | That is the point where I am... i dont know how to solve that. | | Thank you for the help.
If I understand this correctly, many of these problems are coming from apps like apt you installed from a non-Fedora RPM, and because you did not add the repo that contains the FC3 version of these non-Fedora RPMs, yum has no way to upgrade them and complains about the old, incompatible libs needed by the FC2 version.
My solution would be to rpm -e, for example, apt, synaptic, bittorrent, opensc and as many of the other FC2-specific things you installed that do not have an FC3 version available in Fedora, and do the yum update again and see what errors are left.
- -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCmNiYjKeDCxMJCTIRAsjaAJ95tQLMBw3FyOEmvmVak5mBTvCa9ACghKPR eN+KHuk14lGI6vgqCkyoGT4= =heyK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Well then, let's all agree on something: how long after the public release of FC4 should we wait until most non-Fedora repos (freshrpms, atrpms, dag, dries, etc.) develop their FC4 versions? I assume that extras, base, and updates-released are the main Fedora repos that we would use.
Temlakos