Re: OT: What's the deal with Ubuntu?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:

On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 01:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:



GCC4 is a improvement. So these would flow from Fedora to others. Other changes could come from other platforms to Fedora. If we cannot share core, we can share ideas.


Sharing should go both ways.

Yes. thats what I said above. obsolutely agree with you on this


Their good ideas include a 'run from
CD' version so you can easily test a release against your hardware
without a destructive installation, and a single-CD base install.
These are great features currently missing in Fedora.


If you consider this worth a dicussion, this should go into Fedora-devel or bugzilla.


I think it should be much more dynamic than a committee decision.


Well its still a committe decision since getting "consesus" on this can be hard but your inputs if proposed well with adequate research and rationale will definitely be considered. The previous "dynamic" discussions in fedora-devel about packages getting dropped was only pointless flamewars. Hopefully that doesnt get repeated yet again


What I mean is that Core vs. Extras is an administrative concept related
to who controls what packages. From a user's perspective the important
grouping is the set of packages that need to be installed on any
particular machine, which will be related only to the purpose of the
installation - and for most purposes I'd expect a mix of Core and Extra
packages to be wanted. What matters from the user's side is the
effort/bandwidth needed to choose and install them, not where the master
copies are stored.



Yes but if Fedora Core should be one CD it shouldnt just be a random mixture. It can be targetted towards either the desktop or server or something like a blown up version of boot.iso . If we target the desktop then it boils down to what should be the default for things like the browser, office suites and so on. If its the server its pretty use to determine that Apache will the default web server but the rest is still open to discussion. All I would ask people discussing it here who believe they have the right solution is to write a good proposal and post it to fedora-devel list instead of endless arguing about it here. You are not reaching the developers and you wont get your problems resolved or your ideas implemented by abstract talks in this users list


regards
Rahul


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux