Henry Hartley wrote:
It isn't that they CANnot, it's that they DO not. I suspect you
Seems to me that if the DO not, the fail W3 (and in some cases) national accessibility guidelines.
That aside, there are folk who for various reasons - some technical, some medical cannot "read" flash sites, and in order to communicate with them then they _must_ provide alternatives.
Does anyone fancy defending a suit alleging discrimination against the blind?
--
Cheers John
-- spambait 1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
