Re: HT control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: HT control
From: John Mahowald <jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:29:41 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ur/a5rHFwYXWbgiEShts6ttCNbooI4Tdag6QV8NSio+Toweco+Hx4YoVggkz/yXpvHY/uGuqeE8pYXVoKsVebtSWfXuzYn3SHTMYHsWDcFj/+pS01sej1nvrqN01KWg4az+kLOvtzHK7EY4cqM5YW6DVdJ2wqbv+ijsZfypYoUs=
In-reply-to: <01de01c5518c$a79d43a0$0501a8c0@pclaptop2>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <01de01c5518c$a79d43a0$0501a8c0@pclaptop2>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not aware of a way, besides using multiple threads/processes to
ensure both have something to run. However, since they are the same
physical CPU, I doubt there would be significant benefit.

References:
- HT control
  - From: Kiss Gábor

Prev by Date: Re: keeping good time
Next by Date: Re: cron
Previous by thread: HT control
Next by thread: Gcc versioning issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]