On Friday 06 May 2005 04:42 pm, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:40:23PM -0700, Charles Li wrote: > > Which is better for slow machine? > > Basically, "neither". You're really askin' for a religious flame war here, > but both KDE and GNOME are very full-featured and complicated desktop > environments. For an older/slower machine, I'd suggest something more > bare-bones instead. XFCE, or just plain Window Maker or Fluxbox. > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit. I agree on all points. Also an old box - - what flavor?? I run a 800 Mhz Athlon with 512 MB using KDE quite comfortabally. A 300 Mhz and 128MB might be another issue. -- John H Ludwig Common sense is so rare, why do they call it common!!!
