RE: Yum update seems to have stalled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 18:07 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> Herschel wrote:
> | Claude Jones wrote:
> | 
> || I'm doing a reinstall and am now going through the update
> || process. It found a huge number of upgrades and was moving
> || through them, but now, on 933/969 it's been stalled for half
> || an hour on 'completing update for gimp'. Is this normal? If
> || not, what happens if I abort? If I choose to abort, is there a
> || preferred way? 
> || 
> | I am unsure this will be of any help, but I just installed FC 3
> | (probably a very early version off a Linux Format DVD - Jan
> | issue) on a laptop this weekend.  All efforts failed using the
> | connection via the built in updater.  Yum update (command line)
> | was suggested and it had only need for 369 updates and I mostly
> | left it alone while it churned away checking aperiodicly.  Near
> | the end I found I found it failed on Natulus, I did a Ctl-C
> | expecting the worse and just tried to rerun: "yum update" only
> | to be told I was completely updated. 
> | 
> | Note the difference, however, I had an explicit message
> | informing me of a premature halt so our situations differ.
> | 
> | It might be possible that an abort may leave you with most of
> | the updates completed, if it is still locked up you could try
> | this "method".  Warning until yesterday I have only read about
> | yum having never used it previosly - I was impressed.
> 
> Well, I ran out and ran errands while I waited to see if anyone
> had some cogent advice to offer. When I returned the machine was
> still stalled. Ctl-C didn't do anything, so I finally cold
> rebooted into level 3. When I tried a yum update again, it said
> there was a missing dependency 'boost' needed for 'boost-devel'
> and quit. I'd run yum with the fedorafaq yum.conf file that first
> time. I just ran it again in level 5 with the redhat network
> utility which uses different repos, and it installed 4 additional
> packages and said it was completely up to date. It's funny, this
> has happenned before - I try one set of repos, and there's a
> problem, and then I use the utility built into FC and it gets me
> past the logjam. There was a thread recently about removing
> up2date and I thought to myself that this kind of thing is a good
> reason to keep it. Now I have an example.   
> 
> Claude Jones
> Levit & James, Inc./WTVS
> Leesburg, VA, USA
> 
> 

I agree.  I have used apt and up2date along with yum.  Although, I
recently installed and updated with no problems with yum.  I also
upgraded an FC2 machine to FC3, all packages.  My cable modem went down
right in the middle.  Upon reconnect, I tried the upgrade again, and it
sailed along from where it left off.  So, I guess restartability depends
on where in the process a problem occurs.

Ron


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux