On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 18:42 -0400, Debbie Deutsch wrote: > I have upgraded my system from Redhat 9 to Fedora Core 3. Previously I was > serving my own domain, no problems. Now that is not working. The problem > seems to be in the configuration. > > 1. There is a new named.config file that was installed during the upgrade. > The old config file was nicely saved under another name. > 2. The original zone information in /var/named appears to be unchanged, but > it is not being recognized by Bind, probably because the new named.config > file does not reference my zone file. I have attempted to use > system-config-bind while logged in as root to fix this. > > - while using the tool, adding a record for the zone causes all the original > records for the zone to be recognized. However, I can't successfully save > the updated config file due to an error, "AttributeError: NS instance has no > attribute 'owner'. > - I have also tried renaming the original zone file and recreating it from > scratch using the system-config-bind tool, but the same error occurs. > - In both instances the nameserver record attempts to designate a host named > like this - ns.mydomain.com - to serve mydomain.com. The hostname > ns.mydomain.com is an alias for mydomain.com. Also, I have left the little > box to the left of "mydomain.com" blank in the nameserver record window > because I want the server to serve all of mydomain.com. > > 3. The version numbers for system-config-tool and the online help for > system-config-tool match, but the dialogue windows shown in the tool and in > the documentation for creating a new forward master zone do not. Alas, the > tool's help documentation says nothing about creating a nameserver record. > > Any suggestions for troubleshooting this? Should I simply resort to editing > named.config by hand to point to my zone file? > > Many thanks in advance. > > Debbie > > P.S. My system ran happily with Redhat 9 for almost 2 years, and yes I am > the person who configured it originally. I am very comfortable around > computers, but no expert when it comes to Linux configuration. So, don't > hold back, but don't assume I know all the ins and outs of Linux > administration. I may be overlooking something very basic here. --- ls -l /var/named are all the files owned by named:named ? I would probably edit the new /etc/named.conf file by hand and include the 'existing' zone files. Have you updated FC-3 all the way? also beware - depending upon method used to update... cat /etc/sysconfig/named you might be running named in a chroot environment which would have named put its files not in /var/named but rather /var/named/chroot/var/named Craig