El lun, 02-05-2005 a las 18:04 +0200, Alexander Dalloz escribió: > Am Mo, den 02.05.2005 schrieb M Daniel R M um 17:08: > > > I've experienced some problems when using "yum update" in the last two > > days, it gives me different errors related with that repository. > > Could anyone else confirm that? > > That question arose end of last week and has been answered several > times. Please see the list archive. or even better to search the list of > the repository you use: > > http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005-April/012944.html > > Alexander > You're right, Alexander. It has been going unnoticed for me through topics and threads, but it is there from the last 27 April (week's middle!) to now, indeed. Sorry. Maybe there is still someone in the world that doesn't know it yet...: *From fedora-list archives, starting threads: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-April/msg05540.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-April/msg05365.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-April/msg05224.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-April/msg05174.html *From freshrpms list archives, starting threads: http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012943.html http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012947.html http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012954.html http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012967.html http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012968.html Also, dag's repo was involved in some moment (not yet): http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005- April/012856.html BTW, it seems that the problem is still there, according with this: http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2005-May/thread.html Cheers
