On 4/28/05, rado <rado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:32 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > > > I'd not use FC on a server. > > > [snip] > > > > > If you want a Red Hat-based solution then look at the free download > > > versions of RH's Enterprise Linux. I have not used one, but I might. I > > > have been downloading the source updates, and they're relatively few as > > > compared with FC. > Free RHEL?????????? ok...it's pretty early for me here in Louisiana but > I am getting to feel like a mushroom...being kept in the dark and fed > chit. Wow I have never heard of this now! > > > > Agreed. Centos looks a good bet. RedHat plays by the rules and releases source. Several different distrobution use these to clone RHEL. The most popular seems to be CentOS (http://www.centos.org/). -- Leonard Isham, CISSP Ostendo non ostento.
