Martín Marqués wrote:
El Vie 15 Abr 2005 11:21, Matthew Miller escribió:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Wrong. apt4rpm is maintained (By Richard Bos and by me).
Well, it is a confusing name.
Apt-rpm has has less attention than before, because the principal apt-
rpm maintainer is the author of smart. That does not mean apt-rpm is
unmaintained. It's just that a person's focus has changed.
He just has released a new release, a couple of weeks ago.
And said, at the time, "I also belive that this will be one of the last
APT-RPM releases I do."
But anyone can keep the project working. That's what OSS is for. :-)
yes, but the project does require consider expertise and time. so its
not for everyone. Its not just a matter of flexibility of licensing
regards
Rahul
