On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Wrong. apt4rpm is maintained (By Richard Bos and by me). Well, it is a confusing name. > Apt-rpm has has less attention than before, because the principal apt- > rpm maintainer is the author of smart. That does not mean apt-rpm is > unmaintained. It's just that a person's focus has changed. > He just has released a new release, a couple of weeks ago. And said, at the time, "I also belive that this will be one of the last APT-RPM releases I do." -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
