Am Mo, den 11.04.2005 schrieb Reinhard Sy um 15:54: > > > Hah, not so simple - beware the Netgear PS110 - it doesn't play nicely > > > with firewalls and iptables due to an unconventional use of port > > > numbers. (See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.guarddog/825 and > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133064) > > > > > > If you are running a firewall on your computer, expect trouble. > > > > You are right. You find a thread in this list's archive where I > > contribute an analyze and solution. I agree that the way the Netgear > > acts is incompatible with the default iptables setup as the TCP > > sequences it sends are not recognized as ESTABLISHED or RELATED. > > > For me the same trouble since FC3. Turning of iptables makes it usable - > but this can not be the solution! > > Reinhard http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&m=110281479416544&w=2 Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp Serendipity 16:01:30 up 12 days, 13:27, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.17
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
