Am Mo, den 11.04.2005 schrieb Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak um 13:44: > Hah, not so simple - beware the Netgear PS110 - it doesn't play nicely > with firewalls and iptables due to an unconventional use of port > numbers. (See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.guarddog/825 and > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133064) > > If you are running a firewall on your computer, expect trouble. You are right. You find a thread in this list's archive where I contribute an analyze and solution. I agree that the way the Netgear acts is incompatible with the default iptables setup as the TCP sequences it sends are not recognized as ESTABLISHED or RELATED. > - Mike Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp Serendipity 14:11:42 up 12 days, 11:38, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.10
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
