http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list :\ On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:58:02 -0600, sunny McCoy <sunnyloveless@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have received approx 500 emails from you recently. I didn't I ask for > that,all I wanted was help downloading & burning Fedora 2 or 3. Thanks for > nothing but a pain in my ___. As much as I would love to try your product > 500 emails is too much. Sunny > > >From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > >Reply-To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 13, Issue 397 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:11:16 -0500 (EST) > > > >Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >You can reach the person managing the list at > > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > > > >Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: Top Posting and company disclaimer (Jim Cornette) > > 2. Re: Wireless card active, no connection to Internet -RESOLVED > > (apparently) (Richard S. Crawford) > > 3. /var/spool/up2date (Frank Stratton - VE3YY) > > 4. Re: mirroring websites solution? wget problems (Cameron Simpson) > > 5. Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Richard S. Crawford) > > 6. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Chris Ruprecht) > > 7. Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook (Marius Andreiana) > > 8. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Richard S. Crawford) > > 9. Oracle 9i and FC3/RHEL 4 howto (gaurav) > > 10. Re: Wireless connectivity - was resolved, then unresolved, > > now RESOLVED!!! (Richard S. Crawford) > > 11. Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook (D. D. Brierton) > > 12. Re: Top Posting.... (Gene Heskett) > > 13. Herding cats, Was: Top Posting.... (Sam Williams) > > 14. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (G S) > > 15. Re: wide screen laptop problem (G S) > > 16. Snort failing at Boot (Mark Sargent) > > 17. Strange message during "yum update" in FC3 (Joachim Backes) > > 18. Re: wide screen laptop problem (Chris Stark) > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >Message: 1 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:27:50 -0500 > >From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Top Posting and company disclaimer > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <424A2AC6.4000807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > > >Kam Leo wrote: > > > > > > > > > The fedora-list subscription page should contain a great big notice > > > that the list contents are not shielded from public viewing. > > > Regardless of disclaimer(s) restricting access, dissemination, etc. > > > when one posts to this list one posts to a public forum. > > > > > > >What would happen with te disclaimers if one was to end there mail > >message with a . on a line by itself? Would the disclaimer still be > >tagged to the bottom of messages? > > > >Jim > > > >. > > > >You should not see this (test) > > > >-- > >In the Spring, I have counted 136 different kinds of weather inside of > >24 hours. > > -- Mark Twain, on New England weather > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 2 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:28:08 -0800 > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Wireless card active, no connection to Internet -RESOLVED > > (apparently) > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <200503292028.08583.rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 8:18 pm, Richard S. Crawford flailed at a keyboard > >and produced this: > > > > > However, it simply won't connect. I've tried everything I can think of, > > > including disabling WEP, and nothing seems to get this card talking to > >the > > > Internet. I can't even ping my default gateway, 192.168.1.1. > > > >Well, I stopped the pcmcia service and removed the card, then put it back > >in, > >thus crashing the system. When I rebooted, I was shocked to find that my > >wireless card is working. > > > >Typical. As soon as I post about it, the thing starts working. I swear, > >they're like cats sometimes. > > > > > >-- > >Slainte, > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus." > >-Mark Twain > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc > >-------------- next part -------------- > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >Name: not available > >Type: application/pgp-signature > >Size: 189 bytes > >Desc: not available > >Url : > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/2f381a4a/attachment.bin > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 3 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:37:23 -0500 > >From: "Frank Stratton - VE3YY" <fstratton@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: /var/spool/up2date > >To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <ABEGLIFOIHMFMMCMCGMCEEGCDJAA.fstratton@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > >Thanks Alexander, > > > >I also moved the directory over to an alternate disk and put in a symbolic > >link. I found 3587 files in the up2date directory but it only has a few > >RPM > >files. Seems like a lot of information to keep around. I upgraded this > >system from Fedora Core 2 to Core 3 and applied the updates. I can't say > >that I'm very happy with the upgrade path. I lost the automount of CDROMs > >and some packages have some mysterious problems. I think I will back up my > >data the next time and "upgrade" by simply loading a new version and > >replacing the OS. > > > >Cheers, > >Frank > > > >Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:39:57 +0200 > >From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@xxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Var/spool/up2date > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <1111891197.11539.196.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > >Am So, den 27.03.2005 schrieb Frank Stratton - VE3YY um 3:52: > > > > > My /var/spool/up2date has grown to the point where it has over 300 MB of > > > files in it. Can I delete the files in this directory? > > > > > Frank > > > >Keep the .hdr files. I suggest you reconfigure up2date to not keep the > >RPMs after installation, if disk space is an issue for you. > > > >Alexander > > > > > >-- > >Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > >legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > >Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC2smp > >Serendipity 04:38:57 up 10 days, 1:35, load average: 0.55, 0.68, 0.84 > >: > >: " Beware of the naked man who offers you his shirt. " > >: > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 4 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:40:59 +1000 > >From: Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: mirroring websites solution? wget problems > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <20050330044059.GB6093@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > >On 29Mar2005 14:15, Rick Stevens <rstevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >| I'm assuming the web site owners want you to mirror their sites. If so, > >| why not just set up rsync and be done with it? > > > >Well for me, some mirror sites (planetmirror, aarnet) offer MUCH more > >via HTTP than via rsync - for planetmirror it's a side effect of their > >paying-members-get-more-bandwidth system (which only works for HTTP, > >not RSYNC). For AARNet it seems to be some kind of maintenance or > >policy issue. Let me state that I MUCH prefer rsync for mirroring. > > > >At any rate, some things are only available via HTTP. > > > >I have my own problems with wget; not authentication since I'm mirroring > >public repositories. My invocation says: > > > > wget --mirror -D hostname -nH --cut-dirs=ncut -P local-dir > >http://blah... > > > >where ncut is set to get the right portion of the tree. It seems to leak > >out of the site (or, possibly, out of the HTTP subtree) into other data > >producing a currupt mirror at my end. > > > >Are people aware of problems with --mirror? Are there options I shouldn't > >use with it? Is there a standard recipe for mirroring http://blah/sub/path > >into an arbitrary subdir _without_ the leading cruft dirs wget normally > >prepends (thus the --cut-dirs)? > > > >Cheers, > >-- > >Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> DoD#743 > >http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ > > > >We would've believed it was an accidental shooting if he hadn't changed > >magazines ......TWICE - suicide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 5 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:01:35 -0800 > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved > >To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >Message-ID: <200503292101.41356.rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > >I thought it was resolved, but it turned out the WAP had not restored WEP > >encryption like I thought it had. So, the wireless card works fine with > >WEP > >turned off, but not when it's turned on. I've tried: > > > ># iwconfig wlan0 key XXXXXXXXXX restricted > > > >which generates this error: > > > >Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A): > > SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument. > > > >My Googling indicates that this might mean that the card does not support > >encryption, which I find unlikely since it certainly does under Windows. > > > >I also tried: > > > ># iwconfig wlan0 key 0xXXXXXXXXXX restricted > > > >That generated no errors, but did not give me connectivity. > > > >-- > >Slainte, > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus." > >-Mark Twain > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc > >-------------- next part -------------- > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >Name: not available > >Type: application/pgp-signature > >Size: 189 bytes > >Desc: not available > >Url : > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/eeb13412/attachment.bin > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 6 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:14:29 -0500 > >From: Chris Ruprecht <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved > >To: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <200503300014.37349.chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > >Richard, > > > >what card are you using? I'm running the internat IPW2100 card (Intel > >stuff) > >on my ThinkPad. It started to work fine after I got the firmware downloaded > >and installed correctly. > > > >To get it going I used the GUI netconfig tool (Under System Tools -> > >Network > >Device Control in KDE). I set up the key and all that stuff there. Be > >careful > >to use the right number of characters for WEP. the 64-bit WEP used 5 bytes > >(actually only 40 bit encryption). The 160 bit (I think that what it is) > >uses > >13 bytes for encryption. > > > >Since the card works without WEP, my initial thought of checking your MAC > >filtering on the WAP would be a moot point, but I mention it anyway. > > > >Also, make sure that you're actually talking to your WAP and not some other > >thing that one of your neighbors uses. > > > >Best regards, > >Chris > > > > > >On Wednesday 30 March 2005 00:01, Richard S. Crawford wrote: > > > I thought it was resolved, but it turned out the WAP had not restored > >WEP > > > encryption like I thought it had. So, the wireless card works fine with > > > WEP turned off, but not when it's turned on. I've tried: > > > > > > # iwconfig wlan0 key XXXXXXXXXX restricted > > > > > > which generates this error: > > > > > > Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A): > > > SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument. > > > > > > My Googling indicates that this might mean that the card does not > >support > > > encryption, which I find unlikely since it certainly does under Windows. > > > > > > I also tried: > > > > > > # iwconfig wlan0 key 0xXXXXXXXXXX restricted > > > > > > That generated no errors, but did not give me connectivity. > >-------------- next part -------------- > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >Name: not available > >Type: application/pgp-signature > >Size: 189 bytes > >Desc: not available > >Url : > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050330/c51b1b9e/attachment.bin > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 7 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:19:42 +0300 > >From: Marius Andreiana <malists@xxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook > >To: fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <1112159982.3553.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain > > > >On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 13:39 -0800, Aaron O'Hara wrote: > > > Is anybody aware of software that enables Outlook users and non-Outlook > > > users (like Evolution) to share calendar information using a Linux-based > > > server? > >www.opengroupware.org > >Works, good code base, rpms available or use yum. > >Evolution plugin is in beta. > > > >-- > >Marius Andreiana > >Epon Business Applications > >http://www.epon.ro > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 8 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:25:02 -0800 > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved > >To: Chris Ruprecht <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <200503292125.08789.rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 9:14 pm, Chris Ruprecht flailed at a keyboard and > >produced this: > > > Richard, > > > > > > what card are you using? I'm running the internat IPW2100 card (Intel > >stuff) > > > on my ThinkPad. It started to work fine after I got the firmware > >downloaded > > > and installed correctly. > > > >I'm using a Linksys WPC54GS (with something called "speedbooster", whatever > >the heck that is). > > > > > > > To get it going I used the GUI netconfig tool (Under System Tools -> > >Network > > > Device Control in KDE). I set up the key and all that stuff there. Be > >careful > > > to use the right number of characters for WEP. the 64-bit WEP used 5 > >bytes > > > (actually only 40 bit encryption). The 160 bit (I think that what it is) > >uses > > > 13 bytes for encryption. > > > >Yeah, I've quadruple-checked that. Heh. Thanks, though. > > > > > > > Since the card works without WEP, my initial thought of checking your > >MAC > > > filtering on the WAP would be a moot point, but I mention it anyway. > > > >I do filter on MAC addresses, but I've made sure the MAC address for my > >wireless card is on the list of allowed cards. > > > > > > > Also, make sure that you're actually talking to your WAP and not some > >other > > > thing that one of your neighbors uses. > > > >Yup. > > > >Dang it. > > > >Thanks, though. > > > > > >-- > >Slainte, > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus." > >-Mark Twain > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc > >-------------- next part -------------- > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >Name: not available > >Type: application/pgp-signature > >Size: 189 bytes > >Desc: not available > >Url : > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/26743f8e/attachment.bin > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 9 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:57:52 +0530 > >From: gaurav <gauravp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Oracle 9i and FC3/RHEL 4 howto > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <424A38D8.4080608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > >http://www.pagux.com/oracle9ionfedora3.html > > > >might be helpful if you ever need to install Oracle 9i on fedora 3 or > >RHEL 4 > > > >I also want to thank Jean Francois for helping me out on most tricky part > >:-) > > > >Regards, > >Gaurav > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 10 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:30:40 -0800 > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity - was resolved, then unresolved, > > now RESOLVED!!! > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <200503292130.41030.rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > >Hah! Got it. > > > >Deep in the heart of /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices, I found two files: > >ifcfg-wlan0, and keys-wlan0. I made sure that ifcfg-wlan0 had the right > >entry for my WAP under ESSID; then in keys-wlan0, I found that the line for > >KEY= was blank. I put in my encryption key, reactivated wlan0 and > >deactivated eth0 (and even unplugged the cable), restarted networking, and > >even rebooted for the hell of it. SUCCESS! > > > >That was the longest eight hours I've ever spent trying to get a wireless > >card > >working under Linux. But now I'm finally MS free on my new laptop (well, > >mostly; still using a Windows driver for my wireless under ndiswrapper, of > >course, but what the hell). > > > >-- > >Slainte, > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus." > >-Mark Twain > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc > >-------------- next part -------------- > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >Name: not available > >Type: application/pgp-signature > >Size: 189 bytes > >Desc: not available > >Url : > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/57f32550/attachment.bin > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 11 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:34:47 +0100 > >From: "D. D. Brierton" <darren@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <1112160887.6112.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain > > > >On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:19 +0300, Marius Andreiana wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 13:39 -0800, Aaron O'Hara wrote: > > > > Is anybody aware of software that enables Outlook users and > >non-Outlook > > > > users (like Evolution) to share calendar information using a > >Linux-based > > > > server? > > > >Also, you should check out Hula (http://hula-project.org/), which is in > >early stages of development in one sense, but is based upon a *very* > >mature codebase. See my blog entry about it: > > > >http://www.dzr-web.com/people/darren/blog/2005/02/15/novell-announce-hula/ > > > >and in particular this link to Nat Friedman's blog: > > > >http://nat.org/2005/february/#15-February-2005 > > > >Also, this link to something by Jamie Zawinski: > > > >http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html > > > >is both one of the best things I've read in a long while and provides > >some of background to the aims of Hula with respect to calendar sharing. > > > >Best, Darren > > > >-- > >===================================================================== > >D. D. Brierton darren@xxxxxxxxxxx www.dzr-web.com > > Trying is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson) > >===================================================================== > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 12 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:04:28 -0500 > >From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Top Posting.... > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <200503300104.29167.gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 15:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Phil Labonte wrote: > > >> To quote the Wikipedia definition: > > >> "Top-posting is considered improper by some OLDER DEFINITIONS of > > >> Internet etiquette since it breaks down the flow of the thread:" > > >> > > >> It's time to embrace change, change is good. Top posting gis here > > >> to stay especially because of GMAIL and outlook... > > > > > >jeezus, can we just start two lists for every fedora-related topic? > > >one list will be for clueful people who don't top post, who don't > > > post in HTML, who properly trim their posts and who don't have > > > 30-line idiotic, company-mandated sigs whose only purpose is to > > > justify their corporate lawyers' existence. > > > > > >the other list will be for the annoying, clueless twits who think > > >linux mailing list behaviour should be mandated by what freakin' > > >outlook does. > > > > > >rday > > > >Finally, a solution to the problem that might actually work. ;-) > > > >Unforch, the mail server would have to translate the To: address > >according to whether or not the message contained top-posting I'd > >think, because we'ed otherwise fail at convincing said twits to use > >the right list. > > > >That shouldn't be too hard to code up in a bash script I'd think. > > > >-- > >Cheers, Gene > >"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > >-Ed Howdershelt (Author) > >99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly > >Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above > >message by Gene Heskett are: > >Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 13 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:17:56 -0600 > >From: Sam Williams <sam@xxxxxxx> > >Subject: Herding cats, Was: Top Posting.... > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <1112163476.4668.138.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain > > > >Until someone creates a tutorial on email formatting with an exam one > >must pass before subscribing to this list, we are unlikely to see much > >consistency. To enforce it among those who managed to subscribe, modify > >the list server to mark up and return any posts that don't adhere to > >standards: > > "Your message to the list has been rejected for: > > Top posting > > HTML > > Spelling error > > Please correct and resubmit." > >Or maybe, with the excess profits from running this list we could hire a > >style conscious moderator. > > > >Thanks for help with Fedora issues I didn't understand before. As long > >as this list caters to those who don't know everything about ..IX, > >newbies' lacking knowledge of experts' style preferences will probably > >be with us. Try not to stress. > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 14 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:22:23 -0800 > >From: G S <nsbutgs@xxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved > >To: rscrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <65ab587905032922225d9819cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > >do you know what authentification you are using Open System or Shared > >Keys? Some drivers used not to support Shared Keys (and this mode is > >belived to be less secure, nevertheless the name - vole MS even > >doesn't recommend to use it). Check what you have in your AP settings > >and try to use open system mode if it's not set up yet. > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 15 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:39:30 -0800 > >From: G S <nsbutgs@xxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: wide screen laptop problem > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <65ab58790503292239d7bc1cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > > hmm, neither method worked for me unfortunatley. I still don't get the > >option > > > for 1280x800 when I run system-config-display. > > > >can u post you xorg.conf? at least monitor, screen, and device (with > >your video adapter) sections. > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 16 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:50:26 +0900 > >From: Mark Sargent <powderkeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Snort failing at Boot > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <424A4C32.2020404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > >Hi All, > > > >I have snort set to start up at boot, but, get an error and it fails. I > >have checked messages and boot.log, but nothing showing what the actual > >problem is. It was due to a file not being found, but I wasn't quick > >enuff to write it down. Where else would I find this info other than the > >2 logs I mentioned.? Cheers. > > > >Mark Sargent. > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 17 > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:58:24 +0200 > >From: Joachim Backes <backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Strange message during "yum update" in FC3 > >To: FEDORA <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <1112165904.4794.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm running FC3. Now, getting a strange message during "yum update": > > > > '/usr/share/applications/vmware-workstation.desktop' contains invalid > >MIME type ' application/x-vmware-team' that contains invalid characters > > > >I have installed vmware-4.5.2. > > > >Somebody made similar experiences? > > > >Regards > > > > > >Joachim Backes > > > >Joachim Backes <backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK], > >Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing, > >D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany > >-------------------------------------------------- > >Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056 > >http://hlrwm.rhrk.uni-kl.de/home/staff/backes.html > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >Message: 18 > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:10:35 -1000 > >From: Chris Stark <cstark@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Subject: Re: wide screen laptop problem > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Message-ID: <424A50EB.7030806@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > >G S wrote: > > >>hmm, neither method worked for me unfortunatley. I still don't get the > >option > > >>for 1280x800 when I run system-config-display. > > > > > > > > > can u post you xorg.conf? at least monitor, screen, and device (with > > > your video adapter) sections. > > > >My laptop never works with the system-config-display tool (1440x900), > >and I have a feeling it's because the laptop monitor is sending > >incorrect info to the X server. You may have to set a custom modeline > >(and possibly instruct X not to listen to the monitor's info). > > > >For the modeline, in a terminal type: > > > >gtf 1280 800 60 > > > >This should result in something like: > > > >Modeline "1280x800_60.00" 83.46 1280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828 > >-HSync +Vsync > > > >Paste the output of this command (as a single line) into your > >/etc/X11/xorg.conf file under the "Monitor" section. You should also > >rename the modeline from "1280x800_60.00" to "1280x800". > > > >Next, you'll need to add "1280x800" to each of the subsections under the > > "Screen" section. > > > >If this alone doesn't work, you may also want to try adding this line to > >the Monitor section: > > > >Option "IgnoreEDID" "1" > > > >I hope this helps. > > > >Aloha > >-- > >Chris Stark > >Musician, Linux User, & Grad Student > >http://chrisstark.com/ > > > > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >-- > >fedora-list mailing list > >fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > >End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 13, Issue 397 > >******************************************** > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- Adam.Stokes <adam.stokes@xxxxxxxxx>
