I have also found KDE to be a LOT leaner than Gnome. I had to switch because Gnome got too boggy. Marc On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:29:02 -0800 (PST), Bill Schoolcraft <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At Tue, 22 Mar 2005 it looks like Madalin Gabriel IGNISCA composed: > > > ÃÅn data de Lu, 21-03-2005 la 13:55 -0500, Phil Labonte a scris: > > > I have been using Gnome with Fedora since Core1 > > > > > > I have loaded and used KDE just to check it out... > > > > > > My question is this to the list of experienced users; > > > > > > What is better for use as a Desktop system; KDE or Gnome? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Phil Labonte > > > plabonte@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > KDE is more comercial close, but it seems to be better developed. GNOME > > is flexible and runs faster then KDE. I personaly use GNOME because i > > have where to choose and for FC there is more support for GNOME. SUSE > > and Mandrake are having a better suport for KDE. > > > > Hmm, I have always found KDE to be the "leaner" of the two as in > resource usage. I was always challenged with my older machines > and KDE was always my choice. What I mean is that it was always > faster. > > -- > |<----------------------"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"---------------------->| > Bill Schoolcraft > PO Box 210076 -o) > San Francisco CA 94121 /\ > "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v > http://billschoolcraft.com > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
