Darren, the bug (#385) was re-opened by Peter Backlund to "fix a small update that missed the boat ... (nvidia-glx isn't affected)". I added a request to make sure the nvidia-glx i686 module be included. Thanks for the response. The search I did earlier didn't locate this bug. On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 at 15:02:35, D. D. Brierton wrote: > > The issue was raised in bugzilla: > > http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385 > > See comments #10 and #12. There was no reply from the maintainer and > the > bug is now marked as closed. I think it would be useful to open a > separate bug report on this issue (especially as you have found that > that the i586 package doesn't work). I've already searched bugzilla and > this issue isn't reported anywhere else except the closed report > mentioned above. And, on Fri, 18 Mar 2005 at 15:23:54, D. D. Brierton again wrote: > > P.S. Would you please let us know the bug # when you've reported it. > > > Best, Darren > D. D. Brierton darren@xxxxxxxxxxx www.dzr-web.com Matthew, thanks for the suggestion. If no action gets taken soon at Livna, I'll follow you're advise On Fri, Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:01:58, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > It looks like a bug to me. > > My workaround was to grab the SRPM and rebuild it with "rpmbuild > --rebuild > --target i686" and it builds and installs with no problem. > > I didn't file the bug, so go ahead. > > Matthew Saltzman > > Clemson University Math Sciences > mjs AT clemson DOT edu > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs Mark Hoecker __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
