-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 March 2005 23:44, Jonathan Berry wrote: > > I'm looking to upgrade my system with the following; > > Looks like a nice system. I would advise against the ATi graphics > card, but I'm a little partial to nVidia, they seem to be doing a > better job at supporting Linux than ATi at the moment. I can tell you > that my nVidia card (GeForce 440 Go) works just fine with the binary > drivers. I've also seen an FX5200 work with the binary drivers > (though I don't recommend the card, your better off with a MX 440 (or > 4000) or with around an FX 5700). This is with 64-bit Linux of > course. You won't get 3D accelleration from the open source drivers > for nVidia or ATi (on their newer cards). ATi might work, especially > if you don't care about 3D, but I'd expect you to have more problems. > Other specs look fine. You might look at an nForce chipset (3 for > AGP, 4 if you want to look at PCI-Express graphics) for comparison. > The K8T800 should work fine, though. I have a nVidia card now, TNT2, that is giving me all kinds of troubles. The nVidia drivers just don't work anymore since the moved to the 2.6 and that is one reason why I was thinking of moving to ATI. That and the fact that I have that ATI card laying here not being used at the moment. OK, so if I wee to stay with nVidia what card would you say would be the best with 256MB and not break the bank? I don't game much but when I do I would like to have the 3D working. Heck I haven't play Tux Racer in a while now because the 3D isn't working. :( - -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMyDZ0xJrO8dQYHgRAlfzAJ4sLkz0ouoUG61U/mEZ9njfp0Ek6QCgnZON VRSJ+InQrXnP9JUUZlZCZMU= =0w10 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
