Re: network query; route command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:16 +1100, Shelagh Manton wrote:
> Paul Howarth wrote:
> 
> [stuff deleted]
> >> 
> >> [shelagh@pandorasbox shelagh]$ netstat -rn
> >> Kernel IP routing table
> >> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt
> >> Iface
> >> 220.244.163.3   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH        0 0          0
> >> ppp0
> >> 192.168.32.0    192.168.32.3    255.255.255.0   UG        0 0          0
> >> eth0
> >> 192.168.32.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0          0
> >> eth0
> >> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U         0 0          0
> >> eth0
> >> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U         0 0          0
> >> lo
> >> 0.0.0.0         220.244.163.3   0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0
> >> ppp0
> >> 
> [stuff deleted]
> > 
> > This all looks fine. You still didn't say which routes you wanted to add
> > or delete. You can stop the zeroconf route appearing appearing by
> > putting "NOZEROCONF=yes" in /etc/sysconfig/network; next time your
> > machine reboots, it'll be gone.
> > 
> > Paul.
> OK. I just wanted to add the 127.0.0.1 address as it said was a proper setup
> in NAG. I saw the 127.0.0.0 address and thought maybe that I'd setup an
> incorrect parameter at some earlier stage which worked but not optimally.

If you can ping 127.0.0.1 without the 127.x.x.x route there then your
kernel is supplying the route implicitly and you don't need to add one
manually. There is no need for a 127.x.x.x route on FC3 at least.

> Do all the gateway settings seem OK? Mine is the machine with the
> 192.168.32.3 IP. My 2 sons machines are -.1 & -.2. Is this a bad idea?
> Everything I've read suggests that I probably should be -.1 and they on
> larger numbers. 

Convention would be to have the router (gateway) at .1 and other
machines at larger numbers. But it's only a convention; everything will
work perfectly well with your router at .3.

> PS what's a zeroconf route. (exposing the depths of my ignorance here!)

See http://www.zeroconf.org/ for an overview. If you have a working DHSP
server on your network, you don't need zeroconf (might be useful on a
laptop though, in case you end up somewhere with no DHCP server).

Paul.
-- 
Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux