"repaired" php.spec file for php-4.3.10?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: "repaired" php.spec file for php-4.3.10?
• From: Richard Duran <el.freaky@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:00:47 -0600
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uY36xELc7AJEItNDXmEBoayDz/QptSO899IJq//DHjPVv2Z4AgMQKy82HDC/MT9jS1feqNUzvkv9aKeZ6xGQ6EMUIArwFWKCuRrHyIy3HJPS45gS8jf3vZF/7lVZN7zfUnmGdubhdjwxnAHDNo5VcczSiLxZRZqkTCPOGF0jNvw=
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Reply-to: Richard Duran <el.freaky@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Has anyone repaired the specfile that comes with
php-4.3.10-3.2.src.rpm? I really don't like butting my head against
something describing itself as "This is not a real PHP package. It's a
bogus!"

Thanks,
-richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "repaired" php.spec file for php-4.3.10?
    • From: Richard Duran

• Prev by Date: Kernel upgrade or bastille?
• Next by Date: Re: "repaired" php.spec file for php-4.3.10?
• Previous by thread: Kernel upgrade or bastille?
• Next by thread: Re: "repaired" php.spec file for php-4.3.10?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread