No, that is not what I meant : )
FC3 is fine for general use. Generally though..... FC3 is just a little too new to use on a production web server (for me).
So far, I just love FC3 and am testing it serving non-critical webpages and such. I like to give it a few more months for security flaws to be found and worked out and for questions to get asked and answered by folks before me.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kumara" <kumara.jayaweera@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
Hi Paul, do you meant to say that FC3 is not for regular user? in your previous mail, you had mentioned that FC2 is the last release. would you mind to clarify it bit please? Thanks Mohan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Howarth" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 2:24 PM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote: > >You are referring to what's discussed in here? > >http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=0&postor der=asc&highlight=built> Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. > Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package. > > ----- > > no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom> scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
