Thanks a lot for such a prompt response. Now as far as download is concerned, can i download the software to my windows 2000 professional machine and then use the files to install fedora. If not then which is the minimum version of linux i must have to download fedora. best regards, Aakash Munjal > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Alexander Spanke) > 2. Re: kernel sources (Jeff Vian) > 3. RE: A few quick newbie questions... (Erik Hemdal) > 4. Re: new to list (Mark Haney) > 5. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (A. Lanza) > 6. Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration (David Cary Hart) > 7. Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney) > 8. Re: kernel sources (David Cary Hart) > 9. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Paul Howarth) > 10. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney) > 11. Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help (Eric) > 12. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Jeff Vian) > 13. Re: Distributed file system (Matthew Miller) > 14. Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3 (Giulio Sorrentino) > 15. GFS and Fedora (Giulio Sorrentino) > 16. Re: GFS and Fedora (Daniel Ch?nard) > 17. desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login (Eliot Stock) > 18. Re: new to list (Giulio Sorrentino) > 19. Re: GFS and Fedora (Rahul Sundaram) > 20. Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login > (Rahul Sundaram) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:50 +0100 > From: Alexander Spanke <aspanke@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed > To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109250951.2676.56.camel@riker> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi, > > on what kind of fs do you create this image ? > > Cheers > Alex > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm >> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file. >> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long. >> >> The message i get from k3b is the following: >> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type >> and then >> File <file> is too large - ignoring >> >> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in >> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to >> DVD? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alf >> >> > -- > ======================================================= > Alexander Spanke System Analyst > NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH > Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany > Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com > ======================================================= > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:20:23 -0600 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: kernel sources > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251224.10707.68.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote: >> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I >> missing >> something? I am looking for them on the yum repos. >> >> H. Crissman >> > Look in the source SRPMS repo > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:20:43 -0500 > From: "Erik Hemdal" <ehemdal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: A few quick newbie questions... > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20050224132046.B451729952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > >> Using a 200GIG WD harddrive and VIA EPIA M10000 mini-ITX >> motherboard with 512 megs of RAM.... >> >> #1 - I do the install, no problems as far as I can tell, then >> it has to do a reboot. It gets to where it is then asking >> for a "username" in the middle of the screen. I don't have a >> username. At some point during the install it forces me to >> put in an admin name or something, but that user/pass doesn't > > Yes you do. At a minimum, you have a username 'root'. The password is > that > which you established for the administrator during installation. You > should > also set up a separate "user's" account and use that account for your > everyday work. > >> work. Is there a way during the install to tell it "hey, no >> freaking user/pass on this computer"? > > No. Linux is a true multiuser and multitasking OS. Having specific > usernames and passwords allows you to have better control over your system > and makes it more secure. The tiny inconvenience of logging in is worth > the > benefit. > > I can think of one way in which you could avoid usernames and passwords > (there may be others) but this is extra work to make the system easier to > break. Set up users, and save yourself grief. > > Log in as user root, with the password you set, and run > > system-config-users > > at a shell prompt (System Settings > Users and Groups on the menu) to set > up > an ordinary user's account. >> >> #2 - Want to do a dual boot between XP and Linux. Do I >> partition the harddrive first, then install XP, then install Linux? > > That is what I would do to create a dual-boot system. If you are working > on > a system which currently contains XP, reduce the size of your NTFS > partition > to make space for Fedora. Do not alter the small FAT partition which XP > has > created (XP needs a FAT partition to work). Leave the freed up space > unpartitioned. Anaconda will handle formatting for you when you choose to > install in unpartitioned space. > > Hope this helps. Erik > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:22:18 -0500 > From: Mark Haney <markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: new to list > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251338.6468.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:13 +0300, Aakash wrote: >> hi all, > > Welcome. Always glad to see new people on the list. >> >> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to >> know is how to get the software. > > Best way to get it is to download it: > > http://fedora.redhat.com/download/ > > this is a good place to start. > > >> How can i get the media kit for fedora project? >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Aakash Munjal >> >> -- >> fedora-list mailing list >> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > -------------------------------------- > Mark Haney > markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux > 08:20:34 up 18:48, 2 users, load average: 1.06, 1.15, 0.76 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:23:47 +0100 > From: "A. Lanza" <alf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251427.29276.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > El jue, 24-02-2005 a las 14:15 +0100, Alexander Spanke escribió: >> Hi, >> >> on what kind of fs do you create this image ? > > All my partitions are ext3. > >> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote: >> > Hi list, >> > >> > i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. >> I'm >> > using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. >> file. >> > The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long. >> > >> > The message i get from k3b is the following: >> > /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type >> > and then >> > File <file> is too large - ignoring >> > >> > It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit >> in >> > a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written >> to >> > DVD? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Alf >> > >> > >> -- >> ======================================================= >> Alexander Spanke System Analyst >> NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH >> Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany >> Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com >> ======================================================= >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:26:13 -0500 > From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration > To: ssalviche@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251573.3341.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:59 +0100, Santiago (PapaOso) wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Ill try to make this quick. >> >> Im trying to set 8 computers in a lab room all interconnected to a >> router. I got assigned to set mine as a DNS server, and I dont know >> where to start. Please, any chance of guidance ?. >> > I assume that you are trying to create a caching name server for the > LAN. DHCP or static LAN IPs? > > > -- > > Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence > Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm > Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm > rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:10 -0500 > From: Mark Haney <markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Slightly OT - FC4T1 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1109251690.6468.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question. > What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid- > March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone > know? > > -------------------------------------- > Mark Haney > markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux > 08:26:44 up 18:55, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.52, 0.58 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:28 -0500 > From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: kernel sources > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251708.3341.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote: >> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I >> missing >> something? > > Yes. You missed the release notes. > > This may then help: > http://www.tqmcube.com/fc3_custom_kernel.htm > -- > > Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence > Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm > Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm > rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:29:43 +0000 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <421DD6C7.4060609@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Mark Haney wrote: >> I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question. >> What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid- >> March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone >> know? > > http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/ > > Paul. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:32:10 -0500 > From: Mark Haney <markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109251930.6468.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:29 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: >> Mark Haney wrote: >> > I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question. >> > What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid- >> > March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone >> > know? >> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/ >> >> Paul. > > Perfect. Thanks for the heads up. >> > > -------------------------------------- > Mark Haney > markh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux > 08:31:57 up 19:00, 2 users, load average: 0.37, 0.65, 0.62 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:52:19 -0500 > From: Eric <emac@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <opsmpfhhk0u4h0jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; > charset=iso-8859-15 > > Hi im setting up a router box with Fedora core 2 and zebra i use a > buisness cable modem line with 6 static ip's coming out of it i would like > to setup 1 ip address to dhcpd a server for my LAN but also have my other > 5 ip's routed to private ips so i can just set adapter to a private > ip which is really a static.... So looking for info on if first do i need > a ethernet adapter for every IP or can i call all statics from one > wan/internet adapter... also lets say i have the static 24.249.24.2-6 with > a gateway of 24.249.24.1 now i want to take one of those ips first > lets say 24.249.24.2 and assign that to boxes main dhcpd server for > private network of a range like 192.168.100.2-100 1 being gateway > ofcourse... now i want to route the other ips's like 24.249.24.3 to > private address like 192.168.100.101 and so on for each address can anyone > help me with this i also know i need to use atleast 2 nics in box and i > probally can get the dhcpd server up pretty easy im betting but just need > to setup this up right ASAP > > -- > Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:06:53 -0600 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109254013.10707.85.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm >> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file. >> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long. >> >> The message i get from k3b is the following: >> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type >> and then >> File <file> is too large - ignoring >> >> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in >> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to >> DVD? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alf >> > > What are you telling k3b to do? > Are you telling it to burn a data dvd, a CD, an iso image, or burn the > iso image to dvd? > > a DVD is made by k3b using growisofs to do the labor, and burning that > image to the DVD. But if you chose a CD project it will not allow it > because of the amount of data. > > I create a data DVD by using { file -> new project -> new data DVD > project } then creating the file list to be included with drag-n-drop. >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:08:00 -0500 > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Distributed file system > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20050224140800.GA1913@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:57:51PM +0000, Jonathan Allen wrote: >> I can understand how the user directories work, but how do you manage >> the sharing of /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/shadow etc ? > > rpm -qi nss_ldap > > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:09:32 +0100 > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <421DE01C.1050009@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > BJACE MK Raymond Xu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I installed FC3 on my PC with a distribution of 4 CDs. But >> after hosting that PC I found that I can't use rpmbuild or rpm -b. I >> didn't choose to install everything. So could you tell me what else >> package to install to use rpmbuild? >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> raynix > > [numerone@numeronesoft ~]$ su -c "yum whatprovides rpmbuild" > Password: > Searching Packages: > Setting up Repo: base > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 > Setting up Repo: updates-released > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > Setting up Repo: freshrpms > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > Reading repository metadata in from local files > base : ################################################## 2622/2622 > primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 290 kB 00:07 > MD Read : ################################################## 678/678 > updates-re: ################################################## 678/678 > primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 146 kB 00:00 > MD Read : ################################################## 477/477 > freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477 > Importing Additional filelist information for packages > base : ################################################## 2622/2622 > filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 2.7 MB 00:43 > MD Read : ################################################## 678/678 > updates-re: ################################################## 678/678 > filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 225 kB 00:01 > MD Read : ################################################## 477/477 > freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477 > > > rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 base > Matched from: > /usr/bin/rpmbuild > /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > /usr/bin/rpmbuild > name 4.1-1 > > > rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 base > Matched from: > /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so > librpmbuild-4.3.so > > > rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 base > Matched from: > /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html > > > rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 base > Matched from: > /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > > > rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 installed > Matched from: > /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so > librpmbuild-4.3.so > > > rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 installed > Matched from: > /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html > > > rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 installed > Matched from: > /usr/bin/rpmbuild > /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > rpmbuild(VendorConfig) > > > rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 installed > Matched from: > /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz > [numerone@numeronesoft ~]$ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100 > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: GFS and Fedora > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <421DE077.8070209@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed > > Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:15:36 -0500 > From: Daniel Ch?nard <dchenard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora > To: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1109254537.5876.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > I dont think it's for end/home user... > > It's more for Enterprise with more Filesystem server. This is for a > failover / High availability server / clustering filesystem > > Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 15:11 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino a écrit : >> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem? >> > -- > Daniel Chénard > SysAdmin Unix > Infoteck Internet > 5480, Boul. Jean XXIII > Trois-Rivières-Ouest, Québec > Canada > G8Z 4A9 > Tel: 819-370-3232 > Sans Frais: 1-866-853-3232 > Fax: 819-370-3624 > > PS: The Light at the End of The Tunnel > will be turned off until further > notice due to budget cutbacks. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000 > From: Eliot Stock <fedora_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20050224141711.9trlvzs8gogs8okw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Afternoon everyone. > > Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box. > > When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows: > > > eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus > --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3 > > > If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process > disappears > to be replaced with: > > > eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus > --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0 > > > It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod doesn't > automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire). Don't > know > if that's related. My machine is up to date. > > Cheers, > > Eliot Stock. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:24:16 +0100 > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: new to list > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <421DE390.4080006@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Aakash wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to >> know is how to get the software.How can i get the media kit for fedora >> project? >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Aakash Munjal > > Fedora does not have a media kit: you have to download and install > programs manually. > I think you are searching an audio and a vide player: i suggest you xmms > for audio (which is included in fedora) and kaffeine for video (try a > search using www.fedoratracker.org). > For using yum (fedora installer) I suggest you a GUI, such as yumex > (http://linux.rasmil.dk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=52&Itemid=41). > > Wellcome. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:58:48 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <c79487d60502240628903c087@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino > <numerone.fedora@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem? > > Though its a common perception Fedora isnt solely meant to be used by > home users. > > -- > Regards, > Rahul Sundaram > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:59:53 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <c79487d605022406293872224a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000, Eliot Stock > <fedora_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Afternoon everyone. >> >> Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box. >> >> When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows: >> >> eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus >> --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3 >> >> If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process >> disappears >> to be replaced with: >> >> eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus >> --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0 >> >> It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod >> doesn't >> automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire). >> Don't know >> if that's related. My machine is up to date. > > please file bug reports against nautilus and the kernel in > bugzilla.redhat.com. > > -- > Regards, > Rahul Sundaram > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 12, Issue 384 > ******************************************** >
