James Wilkinson wrote:
Bob Chiodini wrote:
The telnet man page is almost unreadable. Does anyone else see this?
Yes. But I'm on x86-64 (shiny new computer)! Are you?
I'm on i386 and it looks fine.
Paul Howarth wrote:
FC3 telnet manpage looks fine here. What is your locale setting?
Personally, en_GB.UTF-8.
en_GB.UTF-8 here too.
Does "LANG=C man telnet" look any better?
As Bob said, no.
The "man" program does not appear to be expanding macros like ".TH" abd
".SH" in the source. Is this just happening for the telnet manpage or
for all manpages? How about "man rlogin"?
man rlogin looks fine to me.
[james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -qV man
[james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -qV telnet
[james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -q man
man-1.5o1-7
[james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -q telnet
telnet-0.17-30
$ rpm -q man telnet
man-1.5o1-7
telnet-0.17-30
Snap!
Paul.
