Bob Chiodini wrote: > The telnet man page is almost unreadable. Does anyone else see this? Yes. But I'm on x86-64 (shiny new computer)! Are you? Paul Howarth wrote: > FC3 telnet manpage looks fine here. What is your locale setting? Personally, en_GB.UTF-8. > Does "LANG=C man telnet" look any better? As Bob said, no. > The "man" program does not appear to be expanding macros like ".TH" abd > ".SH" in the source. Is this just happening for the telnet manpage or > for all manpages? How about "man rlogin"? man rlogin looks fine to me. [james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -qV man [james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -qV telnet [james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -q man man-1.5o1-7 [james@kendrick ~]$ rpm -q telnet telnet-0.17-30 James. -- James Wilkinson | ... and watched Richard Stallman ask one of the Exeter Devon UK | waiting staff whether the spring rolls did indeed E-mail address: james | spring and whether they would bounce. @westexe.demon.co.uk | -- Telsa Gwynne
