Re: FC3 on a Compaq notebook: X trouble

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Douglas Frank wrote:

(Oops, yep, I did mean runlevel 3.)  That's what I've been doing for the
past hour.  Good thing they pay me the big bucks, I'd hate for this to
be easy.  ;-)

Upshot is this: Fedora probes my (on-board) video card and identifies it
as an "S3 ProSavage KN133."  It is actually an "S3-VIA Twister K"
according to s3graphics.com.  I've been running system-config-display
trying various settings.  The only successful combination I've found so
far is "generic 800x600" w/ "generic VGA display" and 256 colors.
Still pretty much unusable :-]

Googling around for this box, I see I'm in plenty of company in not
being able to get X going on this laptop.  The funny thing is, I had it
working with RH9.  Unfortunately I didn't save off the old conf file.

:-(

I wonder if RH9 had a driver for the S3 Twister that has since been
dropped.

On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 15:14 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:


I'm guessing there's a memory alignment problem.  This laptop takes 16
MB off the top (I think) of main memory to use for video.

I've got it up at runlevel 4 now and am experimenting with xconfig


Boot into runlevel 3 and issue the command:

system-config-display --reconfig

This will allow you to set your monitor and display settings.

Please report your results back!
Thomas



Seems to me there is a real possibility that the X driver may be the source of your difficulties. RH9 worked with XFree86 (don't know the release) while FC3 is built using xorg-x11. The XFree86 project did replace some drivers for ATI cards that prompted some display difficulties on a RH8 system I had so it is plausible that display driver changes could explain the unexpected difficulties you are coping with.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux