On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 07:26 -0600, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:01:18PM -0500, Kunal Shah wrote: > > Major problem using Linux as server is the Support. As such we don't > > have proper support for Linux operating system. I understand that we do > > have lot of users and mailing list and people involved with Linux > > community are kind enough to share experience and solutions however, > > what about SLA ( Service Level Agreement)? . > > > > Although I know Linux is much more stable them windows, I cannot > > convince my upper management to use it because of only one question. If > > anything goes wrong in production, what is our SLA to resolve the issue > > and get it back on board. > > > > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 16:05 -0500, Chet Ranaweera wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:37:37 -0500, Ben Sheron <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > There are a lot of people out there like that. The truth is, you can't > > > > please everyone. But it seems like his main gripe is that it's easier > > > > to play games on Windows than on Linux. Everything else I read seems to > > > > just be a bunch of trolling. He probably just got frustrated at > > > > something stupid and, having too much spare time, decided to put up a > > > > Web site to take out his aggression. > > > > > > > Why don't I see a mention of RedHat Enteprise Linux which can be > bought with a service agreement. Ehhh? this thread has done so several times.
