Maybe you should look into Red HAt Enterprise, then you can get a support agreement. On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:01:18 -0500, Kunal Shah <kunalv.shah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Major problem using Linux as server is the Support. As such we don't > have proper support for Linux operating system. I understand that we do > have lot of users and mailing list and people involved with Linux > community are kind enough to share experience and solutions however, > what about SLA ( Service Level Agreement)? . > > Although I know Linux is much more stable them windows, I cannot > convince my upper management to use it because of only one question. If > anything goes wrong in production, what is our SLA to resolve the issue > and get it back on board. > > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 16:05 -0500, Chet Ranaweera wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:37:37 -0500, Ben Sheron <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There are a lot of people out there like that. The truth is, you can't > > > please everyone. But it seems like his main gripe is that it's easier > > > to play games on Windows than on Linux. Everything else I read seems to > > > just be a bunch of trolling. He probably just got frustrated at > > > something stupid and, having too much spare time, decided to put up a > > > Web site to take out his aggression. > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >