From: "Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:49, jdow wrote: > >From: "Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:47, Peter Kiem wrote: > >> >>>There is also a cpuspeed ticked on in ntsysv so could that be > >> >>> an issue? > >> >> > >> >> Its a possibility, can you turn it off? OTOH, I'd certainly > >> >> think that if it was being called, it would be shown to be > >> >> loaded according to an lsmod. But I'd still turn it off and > >> >> reboot just to check. > >> > > >> >Disabled it and rebooted but it didn't make a difference :( > >> > >> Thats what I was araid of. JoAnne talked me into turning off the > >> apic in my kernel, and handheld me into getting ntp to run (I > >> think) and I've set my tickadj back to the default of 10000, but I > >> think thats going to have to come down, its a couple of seconds > >> ahead of my watch in about 20 minutes. > >> > >> Do you have apic on in your kernel build? > > > >Give it some time, Gene. It seems to be far enough off it may take > >a day or so to get down to 2ms type errors. (And if you have ntpdate > >running please be nice to yourself and turn it off. It will screw > >up the feedback loop ntp uses to average out bad data.) > > It is, and I assume the same caveat holds for fooling with tickadj > and/or its server list? It probably would not do anything meaningful. A virtual machine is not really all that perfect an analog of a true piece of hardware. {^_^}