Re: Has anyone dumped udev for devfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:33:36AM +0100, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> It does not work well with PalmOS devices that only appear on USB while
> syncing. You need precise timing between pressing the hotsync button,
> waiting for udev to create the device files and starting pilot-link
> applications.

The applications should be updated to be better behaved.

> No, I don't want devfs. I did not see any reason to replace /dev with
> devfs and I don't see a reason to replace it with udev now. The energy
> would be better spent on better device names.

How? The future of computing is *more* dynamic devices, not fewer. The only
way to sensibly cope with this is by *managing* them as dynamic devices, not
sitting down and trying to assign a name and number to thousands of things
which haven't been invented yet.



-- 
Matthew Miller            mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
-->  Fedora Users & Developers Conference, hosted by Boston University  <--
February 18th, 2005                 <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon1>  


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux