Re: yum vs system-config-package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:19:37 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:20:32 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 23:12 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>Add/Remove packages (system-config-packages) gets confused once you've
> >>>>updated packages to errata versions (e.g. by doing "yum update"). You're
> >>>>better off just sticking with yum.
> >>>
> >>>Hello!
> >>>
> >>>That means yum and system-config-packages have a compatible problem ?
> >>>What should I do if I want to install packages ? User Yum or
> >>>system-config-packages ?
> >>
> >>I would just use yum if I was you.
> >
> >
> > But why not make them sync. together?
> 
> That would the thing to do but at the moment there is a problem with
> system-config-packages, which is why I suggest sticking to yum for the
> time being.
> 
> In FC4 there may well be a yum-based tool that completely replaces
> system-config-packages anyway.
> 
> Paul.

Thats a good idea but how to install the package from CD ?

Wong Kwok Hon


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux