Re: yum vs system-config-package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:20:32 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 23:12 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add/Remove packages (system-config-packages) gets confused once you've
updated packages to errata versions (e.g. by doing "yum update"). You're
better off just sticking with yum.

Hello!

That means yum and system-config-packages have a compatible problem ?
What should I do if I want to install packages ? User Yum or
system-config-packages ?

I would just use yum if I was you.


But why not make them sync. together?

That would the thing to do but at the moment there is a problem with system-config-packages, which is why I suggest sticking to yum for the time being.


In FC4 there may well be a yum-based tool that completely replaces system-config-packages anyway.

Paul.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux